The Obiden Regime Has Imported and Registered Up to 15 Million Illegals for the November, 2024 Election

By John Livingston
May 17, 2024

A well researched and peer reviewed study exposes that a massive percentage of non-U.S.citizens, varying from 10% to 37%, have unlawfully acquired voter registration and are likely poised to vote in the November election. This finding is based upon the most current information offered and a refined method that has actually been completely vetted in a scholastic journal, as provided in a brand-new research study by Just Facts.

According to the 2022 U.S. Census information, there were over 20 million adult non-citizens living in the United States. We also know the 2021 Census Bureau is wholly inaccurate (census takers were prohibited from asking citizenship status) with the true number at 40 million or more.Since 2021 that over another 10 million have been admitted that we know of. The true number may be 1.5 to 3 times greater. Add it up and we have 55 Million or more illegals in the United States. Based on their rates of citizen registration, it is estimated that in between 5.5 Million and 20 Million illegals are unlawfully registered on voter rolls. This substantial number will greatly affect the result of Presidential, House, Senate, state and local elections, The same study study estimate that in the 2012 election 88% of the unlawful illegal votes were case for Obama and Democratic candidates. These votes not only secured the White House for Obama but substantial gains in the House and Senate that allowed the crime family to enact Obama Care, among many other onerous, destructive legislation.

Yes, Virginia, the Crime Syndicate (Democrats) stole the 2012 election and probably the 2008 election as well. They have been at this illegal activity for a long time, and in 2024 they have perfected it.

In 2014, a significant peer reviewed research study was released in the scientific journal Electoral Studies by 3 scientists. They examined the frequency of illegal voting by non-citizens throughout the 2008 presidential and congressional elections. This was the Obama – John McCain race.

Roughly 25% of people who were illegally in the United States were registered for the election. In 2008 there were an estimated 10 Million adult illegals in the USA. The study estimated that just an implausible 6.4% of non-citizens really cast their votes, with the 81.8% of them selecting to support Barack Obama. This estimate is based on the number of illegals who admitted committing a federal and state crime, a felony that can be punished in some states by up to 10 years imprisonment plus a fine, and certain deportation. It is thought that the prohibited votes from non-citizens might have affected considerable election Some experts believe the true number could have been up to 50%. The range of illegal votes are from a low of about 500,000 to 4.5 Million extra votes for Obama and the rest of federal and state elections. It’s possible that Obama and other Democrats would not have been elected if illegals were stopped from voting and providing the margin leading to a Democratic victory, affecting Electoral College votes and an important event that enabled Democrats to effectively carry out Obamacare. The research study identified the citizen registration rate by evaluating details from 2 crucial datasets.

In a current nationwide research study, 14.8% of people who are not citizens openly acknowledged that they were registered to vote. An electoral list reveals the portion of the taken a look at non-citizens who were in fact signed up e 13 million poised to vote and 12 million will vote for their sponsor and protector, Joe Biden and the rest of his Democratic slate. By combining this info, the author’s determined estimate was that around 25.1% of non-citizens were unlawfully signed up to vote. Using these figures there ar up to 13 million are registered and 50% are likely to vote. That, folks, is 13 Million votes.

The scientists utilized the very same information to figure out citizen involvement, and their technique recommended that around 6.4% of non-citizens took part in the 2008 election. This portion was lower than the 8 declared they absolutely voted and defined the prospect they supported. Due to these inconsistencies and other concerns, Just Facts had various interactions with the primary author of the research study to verify all elements of it.

Simply Facts later on performed a comparable examination that used similar information sets, an easier method, and pertinent research study to restrict presumptions. The outcomes showed that roughly 27% of people who were not people were registered to vote, with around 16% of them taking part in the 2008 nationwide elections.

Research study on illegal activities, where policing is inadequate, often deals with a typical obstacle: considerable margins of mistake. This restriction appears in both the Just Facts’ research study and the Electoral Studies report, which are constrained by modest sample sizes and vulnerable to numerous predispositions that can either overemphasize or minimize the real figures.

“Challenging Claims”

Self-proclaimed arbiters of fact and some academics have actually made many efforts to unmask the findings of the Electoral Studies paper and Just Facts’ research study. However, their objections have actually been pestered by an absence of mathematical elegance, depending on impractical hypotheses, vacuous thinking, partial truths, and outright fabrications.

Glenn Kessler, the main reality checker at the Washington Post, asserts that he has actually found fresh proof that challenges the findings of the 2014 Electoral Studies short article and Just Facts’ examination. This brand-new proof can be found in the kind “Expert Report” on non-citizen ballot, gotten ready for a lawsuit in Arizona in 2023.

Dr. Jesse Richman, an Associate Professor of Political Science University, authored the report, which is especially considerable as he is the lead author of the Electoral Studies paper.

According to Kessler’s post, “The Truth About Noncitizen Voting in Federal Elections,” information from Richman’s 2023 research study exposes that just a little portion, roughly 1%, of non-U.S. residents are signed up citizens. This finding considerably contrasts with Richman’s earlier 2014 research study, which approximated a much greater rate of 25%.

The plain contrast in between the 2014 and 2023 numbers led Just Facts to carefully analyze the techniques behind the estimations. This examination revealed that all of the 1% stats are conservative underestimates. This finding was more verified when Just Facts queried Richman, who responded:

A vital element of the Arizona report is that it was prepared as skilled testament for a legal case, where it was at first private till it was subpoenaed. Offered this context, my main goal was to highlight the most trustworthy proof that might hold up against analysis and counterarguments. I intended to provide the findings and datasets to the court in such a way that attended to prospective predispositions and lessened the danger of overestimation. Nevertheless, this method undoubtedly included tradeoffs, and concentrating on analyses that reduce up predispositions might have increased the danger of down predispositions.

Kessler likewise tricks his readers by providing insufficient details, declaring that a 2014 paper discovered that 6.4% of noncitizens enacted 2008 and 2.2% in 2010. What Kessler easily leaves out is that 2010 was a midterm election, and as Richman described in Kessler’s own publication, this pattern follows noncitizens being more activated throughout governmental election years, which would lead to lower turnout throughout midterms.

Kessler uses a misleading method by slamming and referencing a research study from Just Facts, minimizing it as the effort of a single scientist. This method avoids the respectable history of the company and the participation of 2 Ph.D. specialists in information analytics who examined the research study and backed it as methodologically sound, reasonable in its findings, and trustworthy.

Kessler incorrectly explains the findings of Just Facts’ research study by asserting that it revealed non-citizens contributed almost 18,000 votes to Biden in Arizona throughout the 2020 election. Nevertheless, the research study plainly shows that non-cit included a projected variety of 51,081 to 69,000 elect Biden in Arizona, which is substantially higher than the 18,000 figure discussed.

It is paradoxical that Donald Trump was charged by a grand jury in Washington, D.C. for properly pointing out the minimum end of those numbers.

Kessler’s short article supplied important info to Just Facts by accentuating non-citizen citizen registration information from 2022. This enabled Just Facts to improve their previous research study on the subject by integrating the most current information.

Simply Facts’ newest research study, which made use of a better technique from the one utilized in the 2014 Electoral Studies paper that attained the greatest registration rate, exposes that roughly 10% to 27% of adult non-citizens in the United States are presently signed up to vote.

This spreadsheet supplies an extensive introduction of the research study’s research study style and findings. Noteworthy enhancements over earlier examinations consist of:

A more precise technique for determining tasting mistakes, the application of 2 various methods to think about different circumstances, and the addition of numerous citizenship-related concerns in the study to decrease the possibilities of unintended mistakes by individuals were utilized. In line with on illegal habits, there exist unpredictabilities in the findings. For example, the research study presumes that all people determining as “people” in the study are undoubtedly people, which might not hold true as 2013 research study in Demographic Research suggesting that particular non-citizen groups typically incorrectly declare citizenship in Census studies. If these sly study individuals show various citizen registration patterns compared to other non-citizens, it might possibly affect the research study results.

High quality research study requirements mandate that presumptions need to be plainly specified and supported to guarantee a fairly sound discussion of clinical info. Some scholars have actually blatantly neglected this requirement when talking about non-citizen ballot, while Just Facts’ research study vigilantly uses transparent descriptions for its presumptions.

Projected Consequences

Throughout governmental elections, around half of the non-citizen registrants exercise their right to cast a tally. Thinking about that in between 10% and 27% of non-citizens are currently on the citizen rolls, it is prepared for that around 5% to 13% of them will take part in the 2024 governmental and congressional elections in infraction of the law.

According to the 2022 U.S. Census information, there were at least 19.7 million people of voting age residing in the United States who were not people. It is very important to keep in mind that this figure is likely an underestimation, as it does not represent non-citizens who misrepresent themselves as people or stop working to take part in Census studies.

In addition, the overall of 19.7 million omits various people without citizenship who have actually shown up in the nation considering that 2022, including those who moved lawfully, went into the nation unlawfully, and those given entry under the Biden administration’s unique authorization programs.

According to the readily available data, it’s approximated that in between 1 million and 2.7 million people who are not U.S. residents might cast unlawful tallies in the upcoming 2024 governmental and congressional elections, unless more robust safeguards are put in place to make sure the stability of the electoral procedure.

To stop non-citizens from voting unlawfully, Congressional Republicans have actually proposed a 22-page costs that mandates people to offer proof of their United States citizenship in order to sign up for federal elections.

Throughout protection of journalism conference where the costs was presented, numerous media companies such as Associated Press, CNN, NBC News, Rolling Stone, and NPR slammed the legislation, considering it redundant. NPR, in particular, highlighted that non-citizens enacting federal elections is currently by law and specified that there is no considerable evidence to recommend that noncitizens are enacting anything aside from extremely percentages.

Contrary to accusations that mirror the Biden administration’s position, a wealth of proof, consisting of the Electoral Studies paper and research study performed by Just Facts, shows that chances for non-citizens to cast ballots abound, opposing these claims.

Opening the Path to Fraudulent Ballots
In all 50 states, evidence of U.S. citizenship is obligatory to receive federal election citizen registration, and it is a federal offense for non-citizens to incorrectly state citizenship to get ballot advantages. Nonetheless, the ways to support these laws are insufficient, and loopholes are plentiful, enabling people to prevent them.
A significant illustration of this is that federal legislation requireds every state to enlist citizens for nationwide elections utilizing a standardized type produced by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. While this kind requires that people verify their U.S. citizenship, it does not require supplying paperwork to support this claim.

Courts, backed by the Obama administration, avoided states like Arizona and Georgia from mandating that people sending the federal type program evidence of citizenship.

In lieu of citizenship confirmation, the federal type allows people to sign up and cast their tallies by providing different types of recognition, such as an energy costs or bank declaration, as alternative documents.

The federal file likewise consists of particular standards for specific states that have plenty of spaces that may make it possible for people who are not residents to register. The instructions for New Jersey resemble those in lots of other states:

To sign up to vote, you require to supply the last 4 digits of your Social Security number’s License number. If you do not have either, just compose “NONE” on the type, and the State will designate you a unique number for registration functions. Additionally, the NJ State kind uses a choice to sign up for federal elections without a Social Security or chauffeur’s license number by sending a copy of a present and legitimate image ID, or a file revealing your name and present address such as a shop subscription ID, trainee ID, lease invoice, or federal government check.

Neglecting that info, the New York Times just recently condemned Elon Musk for declaring that undocumented immigrants can enact federal which a government-issued ID is not needed to vote.

The Times argued that Musk’s declaration was incorrect as citizens are mandated by federal law to validate their recognition throughout the registration procedure. The link offered directs to a report by the Brennan Center for Justice, a liberal company, which asserts that the intro of brand-new recognition rules in a 2002 federal ballot law might posture a substantial hazard to citizens’ rights.

Left out from the Times‘ report is the reality that the Brennan Center properly lays out the recognition requirements stated in the law, which line up with Musk’s declaration. Particularly, the law does not require government-issued recognition or evidence of citizenship; rather, a file as easy as an energy costs or bank declaration is considered adequate to satisfy the law’s requirements, as substantiated by the 2002 legislation and present U.S. election code.

Barack Obama succinctly highlighted the failure to do something about it versus non-citizens taking part in prohibited ballot right before the 2016 U.S. governmental election. Throughout a discussion with starlet Gina Rodriguez, he was asked whether “Dreamers” and people without legal migration status would deal with deportation if they took part in ballot. Obama’s action was:

That’s not precise. The truth is, when you cast a tally, you’re doing so as a resident. There’s no circumstance in which citizen registration records are all of a sudden inspected, resulting in examinations and so on.

By avoiding the truth that Dreamers and undocumented immigrants do not hold citizenship, Obama’s obvious position was that there’s no useful method to promote the law that prohibits them from taking part in the electoral procedure.

Republican politicians are looking for to resolve this problem, whereas Democrats and the media are asserting that it is non-existent in spite of considerable proof showing otherwise.

Validating Citizenship

Carrying out a law that mandates government-issued IDs or Social Security numbers for citizen registration at the federal or state level would not function as conclusive evidence of citizenship, as deceptive recognition is an extensive problem amongst non-U.S. residents.

To highlight the point, in 2013, the leading insurance coverage specialist at the U.S. Social Security Administration made a significant forecast that:

In 2010, roughly 0.7 million unapproved immigrants were utilized utilizing Social Security numbers gotten through deceptive birth certificates, while an extra 1.8 million unapproved immigrants dealt with Social Security numbers that did not match names. A U.S Office examination in 200 extensive use of deceitful files by aliens. For instance, migration authorities in Los Angeles seized almost 2 million fake files in November 1998, consisting of irreversible resident cards and Social Security cards meant for circulation across the country.

In 2005, the New York Times mentioned that phony ID plans, including a permit and a Social Security card, could be bought for around $150 in immigrant communities throughout California.

Especially, in 2017, California’s highest-ranking Democratic senator, Kevin De Leon, made a striking admission in a public declaration.

I can with confidence state that half of my member of the family would be at danger of deportation under the present executive order, merely since they’ve acquired phony recognition files, such as Social Security cards, recognition cards, motorist’s licenses, or perhaps permits. It’s a well-known truth that nearly all undocumented people have actually obtained some kind of incorrect recognition to browse daily life.

California’s Secretary of State Speaks:

The commission has the authority to request for California citizens’ individual info, however they can not require me to offer it. Feel confident, I will not share any individual citizen information with the Commission. The current court choice is simply the start of legal difficulties versus the Commission, signifying strong opposition from those who look for to safeguard ballot rights, personal privacy, and democratic worths. It is essential to keep in mind that while California mentioned the commission asked for “individual information,” they in fact requested “openly readily available voter-roll information.” California’s rejection of this demand and the capacity for non-citizens to vote raise issues due to the upcoming conversation.

Non-citizens tend to elect Democratic prospects, as evidenced by studies performed in between 2006 and 2022. In the 2008 governmental election, 82% of non-c confessed to voting picked Democrat Barack Obama, while just 18% elected Republican John McCain. This pattern of Democratic prospects corresponded throughout numerous studies throughout the years.

These outcomes line up with the dedications and efforts made by Democratic leaders to offer comprehensive social assistance and total forgiveness to people who concern the United States legal or prohibited methods. this is highlighted by information such as the ones pointed out listed below:

In a 2011 study by Pew Research, 784 immigrant Latinos were inquired about their federal government choices, with 81% preferring a bigger federal government supplying more services and 12 choosing a smaller sized federal government with less services. This contrasts with the choices of the basic U.S. population, where 41% choose a larger federal government and 48% desire a smaller sized one. Studies by YouGov in 2008 and 2012 revealed that in between 60% and 71% of non-citizens leaned Democratic, while just 16% to 17% determined as Republicans. A 2013 study by McLaughlin & Associates of 800 Hispanic grownups discovered that 59% were foreign-born, with 53% considering themselves Democrats and 12% determining as Republicans. The conclusion drawn is that every unlawful vote by a non-citizen weakens the legal vote of a resident, breaking their Constitutional ballot rights.

“Compelling proof and information support the following conclusion:”

Non-citizens have lots of chances to participate in unlawful ballot. It is approximated that in between 10% to 27% of non-citizens are signed up to vote,5% to 13% in fact enacting governmental elections. Most of these unlawful votes are cast in favor of. With over 20 million non-citizen living in the U.S., it is forecasted that around 1.0 million to 2.7 countless them will participate in prohibited ballot in 2024 unless more stringent election stability procedures are put in place. This has the prospective to substantially affect the results of close significant elections and weaken the voice of the American electorate.

Instead of notifying the general public about these realities or lowering this risk to the ballot rights of all people, “reality checkers,” popular media companies, and chosen members of the Democratic celebration are declining to acknowledge the presence of this concern.