Freedom of Speech is Non-Negotiable!


The Colorado Supreme Court’s Choice to Disqualify Previous President Donald Trump

The Colorado Supreme Court’s choice to disqualify previous President Donald Trump from next year’s presidential tally “is so anti-democratic,” constitutional expert and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz stated on Wednesday.

In a narrow 4-3 judgment on Tuesday, the court identified that Trump is the very first governmental prospect to be disqualified from the White House under a little-used constitutional provision that restricts individuals who have participated in “insurrection or disobedience” from holding public office.

Dershowitz, appearing on “National Report,”called the decision “ridiculous.”

“In the 60 years I’ve been practicing and teaching law, I’ve never seen a decision that’s so anti-democratic therefore unconstitutional; it is ridiculous,” Dershowitz informed co-hosts Emma Rechenberg and Jon Glasgow. “The concept that the 14th Amendment was expected to replacement for the impeachment arrangement, carefully prepared by the , is wrong.”

The 14th Amendment stipulates the procedure, which clearly states Congress shall have the power to make sure that a person can not run for office, Dershowitz continued.

The Constitution’s 14th Amendment provides a way to impeach a president and avoid them from running for office again, however it needs a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. However, the idea that states can unilaterally disqualify a presidential prospect without adhering to this formal procedure weakens democratic concepts.

Also, the Harvard University professor emeritus kept in mind, Trump has actually not been charged or convicted of participating in an insurrection, a term that has not been specified legally.

The result of the Colorado choice will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, and Dershowitz forecasts that the court will not rule in favor of Colorado, with a majority vote that surpasses a conservative majority.

I believe this case will be decided not along party lines in the Supreme Court,” he stated. “I think this is such an extreme stretch of the 14th Amendment that he will get more votes than just individuals he selected to the Supreme Court and even the 5-4 conservative bulk. I suspect you’ll get the chief justice, and I presume he’ll get some other justices, too.

The declaration is a gross exaggeration. A basic reading of the text reveals that it does not refer to the president. The arrangement in question particularly refers to a senator, representative, or elector, and outlines their oath of workplace, which stands out from the presidential oath.

“So even the text of the Constitution does not make it suitable to the president. However the change itself was developed just to prevent people who combated in the Civil War from running for particular offices.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x