ALL Federal Agencies Register Supporting Biden Campaign.
Supreme Court Won’t Consider Challenge to Biden’s Order 14019 on Elections Until Sept. 30.
The Supreme Court is unlikely to render a decision before the November 5 elections for president and Congress, implying its actions will not influence the result of the approaching polls.
Pennsylvania’s state lawmakers have sent a formal request to the court for an immediate examination of the Keefer v. Biden case, looking for a higher authority’s decision before a last judgment is made.
Petitions before judgment are hardly ever given by the Court.
A challenge to a decision not in favor made by a federal district court is currently awaiting by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
A minimum of 4 of the nine justices should vote to grant a petition for it to advance to the oral argument phase at the Supreme Court.
Although the courts might consider the case, this is my primary concern
Republican politicians in Congress do not have the willpower to stop this extraordinary and unconstitutional use of our federal government to hinder our elections in 2024. Republicans are currently behind the Democratic device in turning out votes, and this will just increase their efforts.
Unsurprisingly, Biden and his project are “progressively positive” and will win despite bad polling and collapsing approval numbers. Among other schemes and frauds, their woke, commie Leftist NGOs are blatantly registering hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of illegals to vote in November. These votes do not appear in opinion polls and will likely provide Biden’s margin of victory in the swing states. Object, and they will shut you up. The courts are nearly fully controlled or intimidated.
I’m not going to sit aside and not do anything. And neither should you.
Pennsylvania lawmakers contest the order’s constitutionality and assert that arranging voter registration efforts is not a legitimate responsibility. They are also objecting to a regulation provided by the previous Democratic governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Wolf.
The lawmakers argued in their suit that the executive actions breached their rights under the U.S. Constitution by usurping their power to prescribe the time, place, and manner of holding elections.
Judge Jennifer Wilson, who was selected by President Donald Trump in 2019, ruled on March 26 that the lawsuit brought by individual state legislators in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania was dismissed due to absence of standing.
The judge ruled that specific lawmakers did not have the required authority to sue over an action that harmed the legislative body as a cumulative entity.
“They claimed that the harm was entirely to the organization itself, originating from a broad diminution of its lawmaking authority.”
A vague, generalized claims that elections, usually, will be weakened, is not the type of case or debate that this court may rule on under Article III [of the U.S. Constitution]”
The lawmakers informed the Supreme Court that they wanted expedited consideration of the standing issue, so if they prevail, “they can obtain an initial injunction in the district court well before the November 2024 election.
But the case won’t be fast-tracked, the nation’s highest court ruled. While on April 29, the lawmakers filed a motion asking the Supreme Court to expedite factors to consideration of the petition, the justices denied the motion in an anonymous order on May 20 without remark. No justices dissented.
According to the petition, Ms. Keefer and her co-plaintiffs argue that Executive Order 14019 unlawfully advises federal agencies to divert funds and resources toward citizen registration initiatives and election turnout efforts, bypassing the essential congressional approval and appropriations mandated by federal statutes.
The order also requires federal companies to utilize federal government resources to work with specific nongovernmental third-party organizations selected by the Biden administration and whose names and roles have been withheld from the general public. Among these are the same NGOs that are registering illegals to vote in the November election.
The petition argues that there is a concern that President Biden, who is running for re-election in 2024, will from the executive action he initiated.
The executive order’s enforcement is viewed as taking power far from Pennsylvania state law and negating the legal impact of a state statute, consequently preventing private state lawmakers from accomplishing their preferred legal results through their vote.
” [This is] a legally cognizable injury under Article III … since the private state legislators’ votes were nullified,” the petition reads.
Led by Rep. Dan Meuser (R-Pa.), a bloc of federal officeholders filed a friend-of-the-court brief on May 28, urging the Supreme Court to hear the petition. The U.S. Constitution’s elections clause places the main responsibility for administering federal elections in the hands of state legislatures, with restricted oversight by Congress, they wrote.
The president can’t make all federal companies get associated with voter registration and participation, the brief states.
This “illicit authority” provides a “hazard to the fairness of our elections” and “threatens to transform the White House into a partisan political campaign headquarters.” It also allows one political party “to target key demographics and to utilize federal authority to form elections to prefer the party and its prospects.
The other federal lawmakers on the short are Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.); Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.); Mike Kelly (R-Pa.); Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.); John Joyce (R-Pa.); Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.); Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.); Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.); Rich McCormick (R-Ga.); and Randy Weber (R-Texas).
On May 28, the Biden administration did not react to the petition. Even though they waived their right to react, the court might still request the administration send a brief detailing its stance on the case.
The opposition’s attorney, Erick Kaardal of Mohrman, Kaardal, and Erickson of Minneapolis, said that in addition to the Supreme Court appeal, the Pennsylvania state legislators are moving ahead with the appeal still pending in the Third Circuit.
Mr. Kaardal mentioned that if a ruling on the eligibility of a particular state lawmaker could be reached before the November election, they would move forward with immediate requests in the federal district court to stop President Biden’s Executive Order 14019, which they think is unconstitutional.


