Fractal Poll – Trump Loses BIG In Residences Without Bedrooms
Trump is trailing 93% -7% in uninhabited lots, deserted shopping centers, filling stations, and 7-11’s.
OMEGA4AMERICA

The Fractal team took the time to re-examine the places in each of the 15 key counties of the seven swing states and survey the people who live in addresses without bedrooms.

This is a highly scientific endeavor – and it has never been done before. There has never ever been a poll of signed-up voters who get ballots in 2024 at addresses where nobody can live.

Since nobody can live in these addresses, nobody does.

That didn’t pose a challenge to the Fractal Polling group, however – being MIT and Georgetown-trained statisticians, we discovered a method.

Before casing the alleged residences of phantom voters, we checked to guarantee we were not being observed, and although we observed people running the fuel pumps at the nearby gas station, which also takes place to be the home of 4 Michigan voters, they appeared to be just clients of the station.

Then, we analyzed deserted buildings – like industrial buildings – and strip malls with closed Sears and JCPenney stores. These had hundreds of voters across practically every state we analyzed – all swing states.

Once again, we were puzzled due to the fact that there was nobody physically there.

In all swing states except Pennsylvania, we gathered a significant sample of approximately 500,000 voters registered at non-residential addresses, offering a solid information set for analysis.

The citizen rolls reveal a growing number of registrants at each location – because we can see modifications in the citizen rolls on a time series evaluation (which we and the Left can do but the RNC can not), we see these as flourishing, growing ballot collection points – in a deserted shopping center.

Since we could not find real voters to be concerned about, we utilized another strategy. We would do an analytical analysis of others in the very same neighborhood who voted and identify who they voted for.

Birds of a feather … That sort of thing.

Once more, the difficulty of maintaining citizen privacy while still tracking specific tallies arose.

Oh, I see! By analyzing the voting patterns in particular precincts, we found that they were small, making it possible for us to establish an analytical structure. Having a solid statistical structure enables unlimited possibilities.

Let’s do it!

In rural areas of every swing state other than Arizona, less than 5% of the mail ballots are being gathered from locations where they are not allowed to be collected. Isn’t that fascinating?

Certain areas where mail-in ballots are gathered, particularly residences that do not have bedrooms, are mainly positioned in heavily inhabited city areas that tend to lean politically to the left.

Who knew?

Next, we began our analytical evaluation.

Has it existed a different correlation for voters living in deserted industrial structures than those living in 7-11s and Walmarts?

Data experts recognize that our findings are constrained by the minimal variety of information points. Additionally, although we can verify that citizens at Walmart places did send mail-in ballots, the small sample size hinders our ability to draw significant comparisons with the bigger dataset collected at 7-11 locations.

It’s striking to remember that a particular group regularly casts their ballots, frequently resorting to absentee ballots. This phenomenon suggests that there’s an important lesson to be found out about civic engagement – namely, that those who live in uninhabitable or non-traditional places tend to vote more regularly than those who occupy standard houses.

Regularly through mail-in. That captured our attention.

Some states do not have 7-11s, they have Wawas and QT QuikShops – therefore we needed to do what is called a canonical synthesis – that’s fancy talk we utilize to show how clever we are.

In plain speak, it suggests that we make the data from 7-11 signed-up citizens play well with the Wawa citizens. It’s an arithmetic thing.

It’s clear that Wawa lovers, primarily found in Pennsylvania, tend to have a marginally greater rate of sending mail-in ballots than fans of 7-11. Maybe the energizing results of their coffee contribute in this phenomenon.

Considering that we are on sample size, the sample size at colleges was big.

Colleges have bedrooms in the dormitories – however, there is a kicker. Colleges also have time constraints – therefore, they can be included in some analyses.

The majority of university student generally spend four to five years pursuing their degree, while a select few may take longer, however our focus is on the everyday experience instead of remarkable cases.

It’s unheard of for a university student to reside in a dorm for over 4 years, let alone stay in the same one for that whole period.

So what would you say when we discovered in every one of the 7 swing states, over 10,000 – in some cases, approximately 40,000 university students who voted from the exact same dormitory for decades?

Spending three years in a college dormitory would be an incredible experience! You ‘d likely have an incredible amount of furnishings from IKEA by now!

Greek fraternities, including fraternities and sororities, provided similar problems, albeit on a substantially smaller scale, with a fraction of the events compared to the dorm rooms – roughly one-fifteenth, to be precise.

We also carried out a test that examined the relationship between the dormitory count and the citizen count. The results of this test were rather unexpected!

Interestingly, throughout all swing states, a constant pattern emerges when you examine the relationship between the number of rooms and student enrollment: an apparent ratio exists where the variety of rooms serves as a divisor, and thestudent population functions as the dividend.

Divide students by spaces.

Here, let’s do it:

1200 students in a dormitory in Wisconsin were registered and getting mail-in ballots.

There are 200 spaces, with an average of 6 students sharing each room. Yuk!

The R.A. our group spoke to stated there were just 2 students per space.

Therefore we have 200 bedrooms housing 400 trainees, with 800 left over students. How do you think that happened?

As they did not have a sleeping space, we categorized them as “bedless.”

Our primary concern was their ballot patterns, consisting of both their position on concerns and their frequency of involvement.

We found another surprise – they vote almost every election – like 90%. They always vote by mail-in ballot. They elect over a year from the very same dorm!

You may send your kid to college and think they do nothing but party – but you might discover they are America’s finest voters. They vote every election – by mail-in ballot – they provide consistent votes for 20 or 30 years.

It beats your ballot record!

Staying in one place like this is a significant benefit for us statisticians. If students were to change areas regularly, it would present a substantial layer of complexity to our work.

In 2022, we utilized a demo of Alabama citizen roll data – they are so bad it became our basic demonstration. That is not part of this study as Alabama is not a swing state.

However, we liked displaying in Alabama that people who were 109 years old and voting from frat houses voted from there for 30 years. Alabama has some of the worst voter rolls in the country – they hide their phantoms for regional elections.

Not just swing states are important, however all states, consisting of Kansas. Please take a look at our video, including Kansas.

You may be questioning the ballot behavior of these citizens who do not have bedrooms.

Here it is – they voted 93% for Leftist candidates.

Just a little portion of 7% stays.

We might not attribute that 7% to Republican candidates, as some of it was data sound – so we estimate about 2% might have gone Republican.

Our analysis associated that “data noise” with errors made by NGOs who hire teams of people to complete these ballots for elections. Incidentally, these NGOs are almost all funded by taxpayer dollars, so you are paying for these fraudulent votes. Nice racket. Now, do you understand why here at I Speak For Trump, we correctly describe the Democratic Party as an organized criminal syndicate? It took a highly organized mob to pull this off year after year undetected until Omer=ga4America started investigating. They’re still at it and will do it in November on a huge scale, as they have 20 million more illegals they can sign up. With the hands on the federal budget and much of the state land local budgets, it sure beats bootlegging, drug dealing, and no risk.  

They don’t search for those voters who are not at these addresses – since they are not there – so being good citizens, they fill out those ballots and toss them into the mail.

Sometimes, they fill out hundreds of mail-in ballots in one long evening – anyone can make a mistake.

Their accuracy is quite high, with only a few mistakes, at around 97% correct.

Looking at 2024, we can confidently say these statistical numbers should hold up.

We are fortunate to have national organizations focused on maintaining the integrity of the voting process, but they are not utilizing relational technology effectively, resulting in them overlooking key issues. Despite the existence of these organizations for three decades, they have failed to address certain important aspects that remain hidden from their view. These well-funded organizations often rely on donations and may not fully grasp the situation at hand.

Since they are committed to relational technology, we rest peacefully, knowing they will not disturb the statistical base by actually finding any of this stuff.

GOP members lack access to tracking information for absentee votes submitted from non-residential addresses.

It’s comforting to think that, come 2025, we’ll be able to repeat this study and likely find similar results with minimal differences.

We are sure Trump will do well with all the polls we see.

Regrettably, the polls do not include the votes from over 500,000 individuals in each swing state whose addresses are deemed ineligible due to the absence of bedrooms.

Overwhelming Majority: 97% of Votes Favor Progressive, Woke, Commie, and Leftist Candidates.

Republicans enlisted 100,000 individuals to serve as poll watchers to ensure that every vote is accurately counted, with the possibility of reducing the 7% margin of error. The count will be watched, but the fraudulent ballots will go undetected just like they did in 2020, 2022, and many other years. Probably a third of the politicos are in the House, Senate, and state legislatures. city and county would not be there if this massive fraud were detected and stopped. 

Jay led the team that built the eBay fraud engine, the underlying technology for the TSA No-Fly List and the fraud systems for State Farm, GEICO, USAA and other major insurers.