Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of Conservatives
LinkedIn, Google Openly Censor Conservatives (Again) After SCOTUS Murthy Decision
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of ConservativesWhile the court’s 2 other centrists, Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts, are similarly culpable (in addition to its leftist bloc) in allowing the atrocity that is Murthy v. Missouri, it was Barrett’s name on the bulk opinion.
And, indeed, her support for the wrong side in several of the court’s other recent landmark cases has raised serious red flags.
Pundit Mark Levin speculated recently that Barrrett has actually already gone the way of Harry Blackmun and David Souter– two Republican-appointed justices who had, by the end of their terms, become a few of its most unabashedly left-leaning, most likely due to what is in some cases called the “Greenhouse impact” in honor of a former New York Times press reporter fond of haranguing the court’s conservatives.
According to Newsweek, Levin said on a current podcast that Barrett has selected to welcome the function of a political leader rather than that of a Levin also forecasted that by the time her term ends, the 52-year-old justice will have entirely moved towards liberal views. What Levin means to say but won’t is that ACB has now become a deep state functionary of the organized crime syndicate that masquerades as the Democratic party along with Roberts and Kavanagh. I wonder how Barrett and Kab=banagh were recommended to Trump? Its going to be difficult to undue this massive error. ABC also voted against giving Trump immunity. She is a disaster becoming a catastrophe.
With Democrats in Congress and the media putting in immense pressure on conservative justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, possibly Barrett, the court’s youngest jurist– who changed liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsberg– stays in survival mode, choosing to pick her fights thoroughly.
Nevertheless, she is compromising important civil rights, like the freedom of speech secured by the First Amendment the democratic foundations of the United States.
CHILLING IMPLICATIONS
Barrett’s maverick streak made no distinction in the current Fischer and Trump judgments– which sided in favor of conservatives by, respectively, tossing the Justice Department’s overreach on Jan. 6 “obstruction” cases and requiring the D.C. district court to adjudicate whether previous President Donald Trump’s 2020 election difficulties get approved for governmental resistance.
Nevertheless, the Murthy decision—which found the court’s “damp noodle” wing delivering a win for Big Tech and the Deep State by deciding that the complainants did not have enough standing after years of alarming anti-conservative censorship and government collusion on social media platforms—will continue to have cooling implications for free speech until the best case comes along to overturn it.
It efficiently gave websites like Google (and YouTube), Facebook (and Instagram), LinkedIn and countless other leftist controlled tech companies carte blanche to continue the sort of outright suppression of views that lots of noted in the lead-up to the 2020 election, with Hunter Biden’s laptop ending up being the most ignominious example.
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of ConservativesIn addition to the laptop, the case handled the aggressive suppression of COVID apprehension– much of which has substantiated as legitimate, however which continues to be mischaracterized due to the preconception connected by government-backed propaganda that was developed to clear the paths for Big Pharma’s mRNA “vaccines” to get their emergency approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
Then there are the questions surrounding the irregularities in the 2020 election– concerns that have sustained ongoing suspicions of huge vote scams and a taken election, given that all of the significant public and personal organizations colluded to prevent any sort of meaningful presentation of proof.
The suppression of this vital element in democratic processes has enabled the Biden administration to continue spreading fallacy after falsehood, eventually causing President Joe Biden’s devastating argument performance, where the fact lastly caught up with him.
Fortun seeking to weaken the authenticity of the election, the Supreme Court had intervened simply days prior, supplying a timely increase to their efforts.
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of ConservativesA three-word post from Biden’s account on Tuesday explained that Democrats are fully aware of the Murthy decision’s implications and have every intention of leveraging them to their fullest advantage.
While the spotlight stays on President Biden’s health and ability to lead, a fresh strategy is emerging amongst Democratic strategists. They intend to divert attention from the continuous dispute within their party by highlighting a set of from a conservative think-tank, presenting them as a diversion and a new focus for the media.
Those who followed the president’s idea to look up the Heritage Foundation’s Project on Google would find very little information about the policies and wouldn’t discover that the specialists created the proposals without Trump’s direct involvement as the party leader.
The primary goal of the effort was to offer specialist analysis and research study that was “candidate agnostic,” in the words of Project 2025 director Paul Dans.
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of ConservativesNevertheless, Biden’s campaign appears to have introduced and promoted its own fake Project 2025 website—an amazingly brazen technique, particularly coming from the party that has so frequently panicked about the spread of disinformation hindering the electoral procedure.
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of Conservatives. Meanwhile, the top search results for Google– and other engines, such as Yahoo and Duck Go– are loaded with Democrat talking points from sources like Media Matters and the Marc Elias-backed blog site “Democracy Docket.
Although Headline USA’s post exposing these frauds was prominently showcased on ZeroHedge over the weekend and received over 133,000 views, conservative media coverage of Project 2025 is especially lacking several pages down in the search results page.
COMMUNITY DOUBLE-STANDARDS AT LINKEDIN
Search engines like Google are not the only ones likely to relish in their newfound freedom to censor dissenting or disagreeable viewpoints with impunity.
Social-media users can expect platforms traditionally hostile to conservative views to begin ratcheting up those efforts yet again, likely under duress from the federal intelligence apparatus.
LinkedIn, founded by notorious lawfare financier Reid Hoffman, has long been suspected of being one of the worst offenders.
Because the site is oriented toward professional networking, it is understandable that it might have some tightly enforced community standards not found on other sites. Unfortunately, those standards are inconsistently applied and often have appeared to target conservative viewpoints.
And we have the receipts to prove it.
On Tuesday night, this editor responded to a post from Michael Cohen, the former Trump lawyer turned antagonist and key witness in his Manhattan porn-star trial.
Screenshot via Linkedin
Cohen notably referred to former Trump Administration Attorney General William Barr as the “POS [piece of s**t] Attorney General #BillBarr.”
The response simply pointed out the irony over the fact that Trump and his supporters likely shared Cohen’s disdain for Barr, who ultimately revealed himself to be just as disloyal to the president as Cohen.
But unlike Cohen’s original post, the response was promptly flagged as “hate speech” by LinkedIn’s automatic artificial-intelligence thoughtcrime scanners.
Screenshot via Linkedin
An effort to appeal the censorship was, likewise, swiftly shut down.
Screenshot via Linkedin
Although I filed a report on Cohen’s comment, that appears to have gone unaddressed, apart from hiding it from my personal feed.
The complaint over the censorship double-standard has now been escalated to a higher level of LinkedIn’s customer service team and is pending response.
In addition to having any negative marks cleared from my account (which I have long suspected may be causing posts to be suppressed), I demanded a formal apology from LinkedIn and an acknowledgment that its enforcement of its standards were inconsistent and possibly politically motivated.
A PATTERN OF CENSORSHIP
On at least two other occasions I have been suspended for spurious reasons, one of which, in May 2023 appeared to be linked to a post I made about the John Durham report, although LinkedIn subsequently claimed I had used mild profanity in a separate post earlier that day.
Another suspension last fall stemmed from criticism of a British Hamas apologist—purportedly a professor at Cambridge University—whose intellectual acumen I questioned.
In response to the May 2023 censorship incident, Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C.—a member of the House weaponization subcommittee who is currently running for attorney general of North Carolina—said that House Republicans’ efforts to hold social-media companies accountable had been slow but steady.
“Although I am not satisfied with the pace, the staff has a broad swath of subpoenas outstanding to social media operators, INCLUDING LinkedIn,” Bishop told me at the time.
It is unclear how the recent Murthy decision may have impacted legislative efforts to conduct oversight and hold bad actors accountable under statutes such as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
A separate Supreme Court case in the recent session shot down efforts by Florida and Texas to enact their own anti-censorship laws, remanding them back to the lower courts.
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn Increase Censorship of ConservativesIt is possible that by gaining control of the White House and Congress, Republicans could enact legislation to hold companies accountable at the federal level. But doing so requires that they first win elections—and the Big Tech censorship industrial complex will be hell bent, once again, on preventing that.
