Huge Vote-Buying Strategy– ‘Like We Have Never Seen Before’– Is Laid to Democrats by North Dakota’s Governor

By John LMay 25, 2024

Taxpayers are being put on the hook for billions of dollars for Biden’s Vote Buying Schemes just as voters go to the surveys.

Guv Burgum of North Dakota– a potential running mate with President Trump– is warning that, under the Biden administration, there is “vote-buying going on at a scale like we have actually never ever seen before.” Mr. Trump streamlines the charge to simply “they get well-being to vote.” What’s the proof behind those claims?

The case might start with financing increases for facilities jobs. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette candidly summed up the administration’s message to voters in the Keystone State by reporting that President Biden “deals 17 billion reasons for Pennsylvanians to support him this fall.

Significant efforts featured in the plan, as highlighted by the Post-Gazette, involve financial investments in eco-friendly ventures, such as assigning $98.5 million to establish an extensive network of electric lorry charging stations across the state. Furthermore, a significant $143 million has been allocated for Amtrak, a job near to President Biden’s heart, to introduce a second day-to-day train service connecting Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

Evidently, the earliest president ever is struggling to get in touch with young people. That’s an honest and extensively cited reason why Mr. Biden has consistently proposed canceling university student financial obligations, with the cost to taxpayers now approaching a stunning $400 billion. Mr. Burgum states, “Citizens comprehend those resemble pre-election benefits. Those are like, hi, folks, please elect us because we’re relieving your debt.”

The same argument might apply to a Democrat-crafted proposition to expand the child tax credit, which now appears terminally obstructed by Republicans in the Senate. If enacted, that would have resulted in millions of expanded benefit checks sent by the IRS in an election year. Not precisely subtle in the message or timing.

In a strong effort to revamp the social safety net, the Biden administration has unveiled a plan to widen the scope of well-being payments. Since October, two newly introduced policies will pave the way for the expansion of Supplemental Security Income, a federal program developed to support vulnerable populations of low-income kids, grownups, and senior citizens. With an annual disbursement of $60 billion to roughly 7.5 million individuals with special needs and elderly residents, SSI is already among the country’s most significant cash assistance programs.

The adjustments will result in a long-term boost in regular monthly SSI payments. They will expand the variety of individuals qualified to receive SSI benefits, as stated directly in the guideline. Simply put, a nonpartisan analysis by the Government Accountability Office reveals that these adjustments will cause a $15 billion overall boost in SSI payments over the next decade. In addition, the GAO states that 277,000 existing SSI receivers will see higher payments, and 109,000 more people will be eligible for SSI benefits.

For liberals struggling to bypass a divided Congress and spread the wealth to more nonworkers, that’s a significant achievement– specifically when expanded well-being checks start getting here simply five weeks before election day. Given that the benefit increases result from federal fiat, there are no offsetting spending cuts, meaning the substantial costs are simply contributed to the ever-growing federal financial obligation.

All of this election could be offset by the deportation of the 50 Million illegals this nation that are costing the economy at least 5 trillion a year in direct and indirect costs, including education of their children and low wages for American citizens along with a horrendous strain on housing and infrastructure. This 5 Trillion, which is more than 80% of the federal budget could be used to pay the national debt, expand business with lower taxes, increase and fund social security and much more.

The administration defensively assures us it can dispense the increased largesse without Congress, considering that doing so is “a proper exercise” of its “rulemaking authority.” The policy justification is tellingly familiar– to “promote equity” by dispensing more and more extensive well-being checks.

Political observers who have been following politics for a long time may recognize comparable circumstances of costs affecting political decisions. Around a generation back, throughout Christine Todd Whitman’s 1993 gubernatorial campaign, there was debate when her campaign manager, Ed Rollins, bragged about offering $500,000 in cash to affect voters in the state. Rollins later reclaimed his declaration, and even if the alleged event did take place, it likely did not have a significant effect on the election leads to New Jersey.

Three years later, leading Republicans recommend that taxpayers nationwide be taken on a far grander scale by the Biden administration’s efforts to acquire citizens’ support. We can’t understand whether everybody poised to collect brand-new or expanded advantages will display their gratitude at the surveys, as Mr. Trump seems to believe.

Although not particular, the Biden administration has bound taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for increased benefits accompanying the upcoming elections. This dwarfs the alleged “walking money” pointed out by Mr. Rollins, as the funds will now extend well beyond the borders of New Jersey.