politico is most likely the most influential of left-wing publications, I often sets the tone for national and local elections and is a prime source of the talking points or the directions that the organized crime family sends to its respective mob bosses to follow. For that reason I read it daily.

That’s why the passage quoted below caught my eye. It’s from a Politico article last Sunday that recognized Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in 2024 and began considering Trump policies likely to be pursued.

Here’s the headline: EYES ON 2025– “Beyond shock and awe: Inside Trump’s potential second-term agenda.” The article continues:

A diverse group of our POLITICO colleagues have conducted a comprehensive analysis of how DONALD TRUMP’s return to the White House would significantly impact and alter the policy agenda from his previous tenure.

The topics include: “Banning abortions in red and blue states … Neutering climate science … Expanding trade fights against rivals– and allies … Waging classroom culture wars … Trying to kill the electric car … Neutering the federal election hacking watchdog … Bombing Mexico? … Deploying U.S. troops against Americans … Abandoning NATO.”

Politico may be far left, which is fine, but they’re good at reading tea leaves on political winners and losers. That aside, the article was a case of intentional fearmongering by trying to scare voters and investors about potential Trump policies.

To ensure a balanced perspective, let’s examine each of these subheadlines critically and assess the potential implications of a second Trump term for the American people.

Banning abortions in red and blue states.

This claim is false. In the 2022 Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion anywhere. The court said that abortion is not covered by the U.S. Constitution and therefore under the 10th Amendment, the matter is left to the states

Some states will ban abortion, some states will facilitate it and others will find a middle ground such as a ban after 15 weeks. Trump is content to leave it with the states. The last thing a presidential candidate wants to do is wade into the abortion debate when it’s no longer a federal issue. Democrats will bring it up whenever they can, but smart Republicans will not take the bait. Trump has much bigger national issues to talk about.

Neutering climate science.
This is a red herring. The so-called “science” of the climate alarmists is fake science using rigged data and defective models. Real science shows that CO2 has no impact on global warming. Climate change is real and has been for millions of years, but it’s not caused by humans or by carbon emissions

The best scientific evidence shows that it’s caused by solar cycles, volcanoes, ocean currents and water vapor, all beyond human control. Trump might neuter the fake science, but he will encourage the real science and put the climate alarmists on the run.

Trade disputes are being escalated with both competitors and partners. It is likely accurate and is generally beneficial. The United States has been lowering tariffs and sending American jobs overseas for many years. Trump is advocating for higher tariffs, higher expenses for foreign manufacturers, and the repatriation of manufacturing jobs to the U.S. This approach mirrors historical U.S. policy from 1787 to 1962, initiated by Alexander Hamilton and followed by Henry Clay’s American System. This is essentially what Trump means by prioritizing America’s interests.

Waging classroom culture wars.
Trump wants literacy, mathematics, critical thinking and accurate history in the classroom. The culture warriors want critical race theory, an aggressive transsexual agenda and children’s books with graphic sexual content. Trump’s not a culture warrior and is welcoming to gays, for example; he just wants a return to traditional academic standards. That will help American productivity as more students get a solid education and can build from there with science, tech, engineering and math skills (STEM). The public supports Trump’s approach by wide margins.

Trying to kill the electric car.
Trump won’t have to do much in this regard because the electric car is killing itself. The electric vehicle (EV) was invented in 1837 and peaked in percentage usage around 1910. It was replaced by the far more efficient internal-combustion engine (ICE) as popularized by Henry Ford and the inexpensive Model T.

EVs today face the same problem they have always faced– batteries. The battery charges don’t last long (usually about 150 miles instead of the 290 miles claimed). Batteries are drawn down because that’s how the car is heated– ICE engines use available engine heat to warm the car interior with no added energy.

Electric vehicles’ batteries have reduced capacity in low temperatures, specifically when the mercury dips below 25 ° F. Moreover, charging these batteries takes an extended period, and the scarcity of charging stations exacerbates the issue. Consequently, electric vehicles tend to have a lower resale value, as prospective buyers are deterred by the hefty price tag of replacing the batteries, which can reach $25,000 apiece.

The batteries have a tendency to ignite and explode, posing a significant safety hazard. Moreover, the electricity used to charge electric vehicles (EVs) is often generated from non-renewable sources such as natural gas and coal, thereby negating any perceived environmental benefits. In reality, EVs are not as efficient as they are often portrayed in the media, and President Trump is aware of this fact.

The federal agency responsible for overseeing election security is being targeted for changes. This agency is accused of censoring pro-Trump information and spreading misleading information that benefits Democrats. Critics argue that reducing the power of this agency would be beneficial for democracy.

Bombing Mexico?
Not yet. But if Mexico comes any more under the control of the cartels and if the cartels increase their criminal activities in the U.S., then some military intervention there may be needed. The U.S. invaded Mexico City and took about a third of Mexico’s territory in 1848. The U.S. invaded again in 1916– 1917 in the state of Chihuahua in pursuit of Pancho Villa after he raided Columbus, New Mexico.

A potential new incursion would not be unprecedented. President Trump is planning to seal the border, continue construction of the border wall, and start deporting undocumented immigrants from the United States. These actions could possibly deter a real assault on Mexico’s land. While Trump is reluctant to take such measures, it is still a possibility that should not be dismissed.

Using U.S. military forces against U.S. citizens is unlikely to occur, as it is simply a fictional scenario created by Politico. However, President Trump might consider deploying U.S. troops to protect the border, and he could also utilize U.S. National Guard units in collaboration with state governors (if necessary) to maintain peace and quell riots instigated by left-wing groups such as Antifa and BLM.

It is alleged that President Biden has utilized the resources of the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation to target certain individuals and groups, including everyday citizens, through tactics such as surveillance, raids, and selective prosecutions, effectively labeling them as enemies of the people.

Maintaining a distance from NATO.
Trump is improbable to sever ties with the alliance. He didn’t pursue this course of action during his initial term as president. Instead, he’ll use the threat of withdrawal to coerce NATO members into contributing their equitable portion of collective defense expenses. The resolution of the Ukrainian conflict through diplomatic channels with Russia, which runs counter to NATO’s stance but aligns with America’s advantages, is very likely to be achieved by Trump.

In conclusion, Politico’s attempts to instill fear in their readers have been thoroughly debunked. Their scare tactics have been exposed as either misleading, exaggerated, or actually beneficial. The takeaway for Americans is to disregard left-leaning media outlets like Politico and instead, revisit this article to make informed decisions.

If Trump emerges victorious, concerns about climate change and the promotion of electric vehicles are likely to diminish. Instead, fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas are expected to regain popularity. Additionally, education is expected to improve, and jobs will return to the United States. However, undocumented immigrants will face deportation.

On the whole, the prospect of a new Trump administration could benefit U.S. productivity, economic expansion, and the stock market. However, it is advisable not to make any premature decisions as we must first navigate through the year 2024.