Trump Won 2020 And We Have The Evidence
Recent findings recommend that Trump might have indeed emerged victorious in the 2020 governmental race, contrary to initial beliefs.
Based on our thorough evaluation of initial study actions and mail-in tally counts, we have actually figured out that mail-in citizen scams likely had a substantial impact on the outcomes of the 2020 election in the six essential swing states. The mainstream media outlets, social networks platforms, establishment figures, and other dishonest facilities have actually propagated the story that the 2020 election was the most safe and trusted in history, dismissing anyone who raised issues about Joe Biden’s win as a delusional “election denier.”
That has been the dominant narrative for the past 3 years, which has produced a chilling result and triggered many to give up performing a deep dive concerning whether the 2020 election actually was as safe and protected as we have been informed it was.
The obligation lies with each of the 50 states to guarantee the utmost safety and security of their voting systems. We have the opportunity to execute any necessary modifications within the given timeframe.
It is extremely possible that the 2020 election was of deceptive activities associated with mail-in ballot. Additionally, the considerable extent of mail-in citizen fraud unquestionably had a definitive influence on the election result, favoring Joe Biden.
Register for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and consent to get material that may often consist of advertisements. You might pull out at any time.
Simply put, had widespread mail-in citizen fraud been prevented in the 2020 election, Donald Trump would have won the Electoral College and been re-elected to a 2nd term.
At this point, you might be wondering how I can be so sure that the 2020 election was polluted by mail-in voter scams. The response is basic: The voters have informed us so.
In late 2023, the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports conducted an easy study to assess the degree of voter fraud in the 2020 election. We asked 1,085 citizens who took part in the 2020 election about their ballot habits 3 years prior. To our surprise, the outcomes showed that a minimum of one in 5 mail-in citizens admitted to committing tally scams in the 2020 election.
Our findings triggered quite a stir in the media, particularly among those who believed the 2020 election was not totally protect due to the dubious changes to voting guidelines state officials unconstitutionally enforced under the cover of COVID-19.
Shortly after the survey was launched, previous President Trump called it “the most crucial survey released in the last 20 years” and “the biggest story of the year.
We began questioning whether we might make use of the poll findings to evaluate the openly available election information and figure out if mail-in citizen scams had any influence on the election results. This was rather a difficult undertaking.
Based upon our thorough examination of the original survey data provided by Rasmussen, together with confirmed details from different reliable sources that track mail-in tally numbers, we have determined that it is extremely most likely that mail-in voter fraud played a substantial function in modifying the outcomes of the 2020 election in the vital swing states.
The Heartland Institute’s newest policy study, properly named “Who Truly Emerged as the Winner of the 2020 Election?” completely describes all the details with precision. (Hint: Joe Biden is not the winner.)
Key Points Summarized
According to a closer assessment of the Rasmussen survey data, it was discovered that over 28% of mail-in voters confessed to engaging in some kind of election scams throughout the 2020 election.
Considering numerous possible levels of mail-in citizen scams, our findings recommend that Trump would have emerged victorious in the 2020 Electoral College had invalid mail-in tallies been excluded from the count.
If the quantity of deceptive activity discovered in the Heartland/Rasmussen survey significantly exaggerated the level of mail-in citizen fraud by a substantial amount, it is possible that Trump would have emerged as the victor in the 2020 election.
According to the official 2020 election outcomes, Biden beat Trump in the Electoral College 306 to 232. The national vote tally was similarly lopsided, with Biden getting roughly 81 million votes to Trump’s 74 million votes.
In nearly all of the speculative situations we present, Trump would have protected a significant Electoral College victory over Biden.
But the 2020 election, like newest nationwide elections, was ultimately chosen in the swing states.
In the 2020 presidential election, Biden protected victory in six key swing states by a narrow margin, with less than 20,000 votes separating him from his challenger in each state. This slim margin was notable offered the large number of votes cast in general.
However, there’s a catch: after examining information on mail-in citizen scams in the 6 crucial swing states and considering various rates of scams ranging from 28% to as low as 1%, the outcome of the Electoral College vote went through considerable changes.
In almost all the hypothetical scenarios we set out, Trump would have won enough Electoral College votes to defeat Biden peacefully. Simply put, Biden’s Electoral College victory, although relatively big, was predicated on razor-thin margins in all six of the swing states.
It is a well-established fact that all six swing states modified their election regulations prior to the 2020 election to permit widespread mail-in voting, relying on unreliable state voter registration records. Moreover, we are aware that some of these states facilitated fraudulent mail-in voting by removing essential safeguards such as signature verification and allowing questionable election practices like ballot harvesting.
So it stands to reason that these unprecedented last-minute changes to voting procedures likely resulted in a flood of fraudulent ballots being counted. It also stands to reason that widespread mail-in voter fraud in the 2020 election disproportionately benefitted Joe Biden, seeing that he received more than twice as many mail-in votes as Trump.
When considering all these factors, it seems obvious that Biden’s 2020 victory was aided and abetted by rampant mail-in voter fraud. But as they say, what’s done is done. It does no good to cry over spilled milk or shady elections.
With the 2024 presidential election fast approaching, it’s crucial that we take proactive measures to prevent past mistakes from recurring. The onus is on the 50 states to guarantee the integrity and security of their voting systems. There’s still a window of opportunity for them to implement necessary improvements.
Going forward, will enough states do the right thing? Or, like so many other things in today’s upside-down world, is the quaint American tradition of free and fair elections a vestige of the past?


