The CCP Is Targeting the 2024 Election
The CCP and the Organized Crime Syndicate Masquerading as the Democratic Party Are Partners In Destroying the United States
The CCP Is Targeting the 2024 Election
By John Livingston
July 6, 2024
Note From The Author
This analysis aims to influence, NOT dissuade, citizens from taking part in the 2024 election. Rather, its goal is to set in motion an extraordinary cumulative effort between citizens and their elected authorities to guarantee the integrity of the electoral procedure, safeguarding it from interference by foreign powers and their intelligence operatives, among other possible threats
We have the solution to stop the CCP, the Crime Family Masquerading as the Democratic Party in their tracks. It is the permeable program developed and implemented by Omega4America and it’s explained HERE. Please join us in Stopping the CCP and other malicious actors in Stealing the November election. The CCP is Targeting the 2024 Election. You can help stop them.
At no time during the Cold War with the Soviet Union was it imagined that the Russians might manipulate a United States governmental election in favor of their favored candidate. Hollywood’s representation of a “Manchurian Candidate” aside, American elections were kept in person, utilizing paper ballots, counted by human beings, with other people viewing them. And, nevertheless vicious and corrupt the typical partisan interplay of American politics may have been, this practice guaranteed that a fair adequate election could be held. Today that is no longer the case.
Regardless of who the nominees remain in 2024, just as in 2020, much of America will hold their elections in the least transparent, vulnerable method possible: absentee ballots. Because of this, a complimentary and reasonable election can not be guaranteed. It matters not that President Trump is ahead in all the polls and in a manner that some pollsters believe can not be overcome. Citizens should anticipate that, given that America remains at war with Communist China, November’s election will be the target of a massive intelligence operation to decide the next president.
The design of the United States electoral system did not consider the capacity for interference from powerful external entities, including foreign governments like China, or rich special interest groups, that may seek to influence the outcome of a presidential election.
The United States sticks out as the sole developed nation that allows the use of absentee ballots, making it susceptible to potential electoral scams. In contrast, other advanced democracies perform their elections personally, with identification needed, using paper ballots that are counted by big groups of people in a transparent way, with results offered on the same day as the election. Disturbingly, some Secretaries of State in the United States have actually implemented or permitted and encouraged fraud. As a result, the integrity of the American electoral system has actually been compromised, leaving citizens without a transparent and reasonable approach of voting. This lack of openness is bothersome, whether it be in the absentee ballot procedure or electronic ballot systems, and it’s worrying that such vulnerabilities could be exploited by foreign actors such as the Chinese Communist Party.
The Declaration of a People’s War by Communist China against the United States in May 2019, in response to Trump’s actions to prevent the theft of American intellectual property, was not commonly reported. Communist China has stolen trillions of dollars worth of American intellectual property. Trump and Mike Pompeo put a halt to this theft.
People’s Daily, a publication controlled by the Communist Party, announced this war, urging the Chinese people to prepare for sacrifices to combat the perceived “greed and conceit” of the Trump Administration. This dispute between the U.S. and the CCP incorporates political, information, and mental warfare, with few set rules due to its nature as a war. It is necessary to evaluate the preparedness of U.S. defenses to counter prospective CCP interference in the 2024 election, as this might surpass manipulation of online platforms and involve a detailed method to affect and possibly steal the election through any available means.
And, though the level of hostilities between the U.S. and the CCP has not risen to conventional military warfare, we should be clear that the Chinese Communist Party is deadly serious in their intent to ruin the United States. The death of over 70,000 Americans last year because of Chinese-manufactured fentanyl– imported by means of Biden’s open border with Mexico– suggests that China’s unlimited warfare is in full operation and that nothing is beyond the pale of the CCP.
It is unrealistic to presume that the current U.S. administration, led by President Biden, has taken enough steps to secure the country from the hazards postured by Communist China. Unfortunately, we have failed to safeguard our youth from the hazardous actions of the Chinese Communist Regime. Considering this, it’s not implausible to think that enabling them to manipulate our electoral procedure is a possibility.
China’s Strategic Design5>
Communist China is a huge nation with fantastic aspirations. It spends roughly $21 billion on intelligence operations yearly targeting the United States. They do so because they have not yet subjected us to their dominance. It would not be unreasonable to believe that they wish to alter this in November’s election by electing a US government more receptive to their national objectives.
The Communist Party has formed tactical alliances with different influential groups. A union of Chinese Communist Party members and American left-leaning individuals, including Progressives and Communists, in addition to powerful trans elites, is working together to wage a political and information war against the American public. This varied group seeks to establish a new world order, where they anticipate enjoying fortunate political and financial status.
The CCP and their communist allies in the United States are working to support the Biden administration’s positioning with China while weakening the political and economic structure of the U.S. China has taken aggressive actions, such as threatening to invade Taiwan, deploying security balloons for possible attacks on the U.S. Operating bioweapons laboratories consisting of one found in Reedley, California including highly lethal biological weapons like Ebola and anthrax. In addition, China has joined forces with Russia in their conflict with Ukraine and supplied support to Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas in their wars with Israel. It is widely thought that these actions would not have happened throughout President Trump’s term.
Likewise, the Biden Administration and Congress have taken part in substantial spending that has substantially increased the American national debt to practically $35 trillion. This debt is on a trajectory to increase by 1 trillion every 90-100 days. It would easily reach 40 trillion by the end of 2025. It is unsustainable. lavish spending has triggered inflation and damaged global confidence in the U.S. dollar as the dominant reserve currency. For instance, Saudi Arabia has decided not to continue utilizing the U.S. dollar for oil contract settlements. Should China want the Renminbi to end up being the leading international reserve currency, President Biden’s financial choices are lining up perfectly with that objective. BRICS led by China and Russia has added 20 more members and their preferred currency is the Chinese Yuan.
The Chinese Communist Party’s efforts to influence the most effective forces in American politics and interactions are not exactly a secret, in spite of their efficiency $16 billion in different methods, such as political and humanitarian contributions, investments, marketing, support for reporters and scholars, and contributions to significant academic institutions and think tanks, the Party has actually had the ability to form the narrative and promote its interests in the United States. This has actually resulted in a scenario where prominent law, public relations, and political lobbying firms in Washington and New York are now lined up with Beijing’s viewpoint, whether knowingly or unconsciously.
These billions of dollars make sure not simply that reporters and scholars reconsider previously publicly acknowledging Communist China’s ongoing malfeasance but likewise that counter arguments– relating to the origins of COVID-19, China’s military accumulation in the South China Sea, or the ongoing damaging impacts of China’s Belt and Road Initiative throughout the world– are developed and propagated proactively by a domestic Fifth Column within our opinion-making institutions. This should come as no surprise, of course, since active procedures are to be anticipated by a country at war.
The United States represents a considerable challenge for China’s goals of worldwide supremacy, as the Communist Chinese see it. From a strategic perspective, China perceives government as a powerful barrier to their goals. While it might take some time, China is willing to wait and patiently work towards world.
Globalists, particularly America’s company elites, will explain that Communist China is extremely depending on America for trade, which numerous thousands of its young people go to college in the United States each year. Why would they wish to ruin the United States? But China may have figured out that they have acted as the manufacturing base of the United States for enough time. It might be that they wish to establish China along different economic lines and expand their reach throughout the globe through the many client-states they have developed. Trade with the United States along the lines of the three years given that China was awarded Most Favored Nation status may not align with their strategic plans.
It might likewise be that the Chinese have drawn out from the West all the understanding required for them to become the most powerful nation the world has ever seen in the fields of engineering, physics, science, viewpoint– including political viewpoint– and literature. Here, once again, they may no longer require the United States. Indeed, they have most likely discovered that the teaching of even the hard sciences in American universities has not held up against the effects of so-called “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion,” which our once-superb research study institutions no longer produce the sort of excellence that built the modern-day world. From the CCP’s point of view, having actually extracted the wealth and understanding of the United States, they are now much better off handling America’s exit from the world stage.
In the brief span of a year following the beginning of People’s War, the COVID-19 pandemic had swept across China and the globe, with the United States subsequently getting in a state of lockdown. It is intriguing to consider whether China’s tactical thinkers would have been astute enough to recognize that a pandemic-induced global upheaval could offer the perfect scenarios to oust an American president whose policies were overtly tailored towards focusing on American interests and limiting China’s impact.
The COVID-19 break out took place shortly before the American presidential, putting the populist incumbent Donald Trump at a downside Trump was understood for his energetic rallies, which were an essential part of his political platform. Throughout lockdown, Americans were continuously exposed to messages depicting COVID-19 as a serious threat.
Following this development, sweeping modifications were made to nationwide elections, mainly bypassing the essential state-level legislative participation mandated by the U.S. Constitution, to mandate using mail-in ballots. Up until 2020, there was bipartisan consensus that absentee ballot was susceptible to massive voter fraud. A prominent 2005 commission, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and previous Secretary of State James Baker, clearly highlighted this concern. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a convenient opportunity to neglect these reservations. After all, who would risk their life to cast a ballot face-to-face during a public health crisis?
At one level it matters not that the American Left was radicalized to make use of the death of George Floyd and the common and incorrect narrative that Donald Trump was a racist and open Nazi sympathizer. The Black Lives Matter and Antifa operations were part of an effort to intimidate the American people into compliance. Americans were to stay inside and accept that their political interaction was to be restricted to television and social media, the latter of which would switch on President Trump in the final weeks of the election. At a more fundamental level it created the necessary political narrative that would permit otherwise sensible observers to think that President Trump lost the election legally. The middle-class hostility to violence and disorder was exploited to suggest that the elimination of Trump would lead to a restoration of calm.
Presidential Election in 2020?
Many consider the 2020 election unfair. A considerable abnormality in the signatures and a sudden halt in counting throughout the early hours in the 6 critical states, with President Trump leading before the timeout and Joe Biden in the lead after the resumption, work as clear proof of this.
The 2020 election result was likely influenced by the illegal event and manufacturing of absentee ballots by numerous entities controlled by the organized criminal syndicate that masquerades as the Democratic Party, all intent on manipulating the outcome. Due to the absence of an extensive investigation, it isn’t easy to prove this claim definitively. Noteworthy is the significant increase in absentee ballots, deficiencies in ballot custody and questionable signature confirmation processes in numerous states. As a result, essential states dealt with obstacles in legally accrediting their election
Citizen groups that did examine were treated not just with contempt, but as if their civic actions were criminal in nature. Charges of Trump fans being election-deniers became the dominant story throughout the left-wing media that only four years prior had supported similar claims from Hillary Clinton and her advocates, claims that stay to this day.
One would believe that a legitimately elected president would have aspired to demonstrate to the world the legitimacy of America’s political system. This was not the case. Undoubtedly, raising the question of election abnormalities was consulted with lawfare and intimidation. For lots of Americans this simply strengthened the illegitimacy of the election and for that reason the Biden presidency itself.
For all their sophistication, Americans are remarkably naïve about the mechanics of their electoral process. They are somehow of the belief that there are genuine authorities from both parties scrutinizing the electoral procedure and, by so doing, bringing order and fairness to the system. Were that it were so.
Due to the fact that we are citizens of a free nation, though getting less complimentary by the day, we naturally tend to think in terms of fairness in between one citizen and another. We don’t like the idea that one citizen may steal another citizen’s vote or that another group would engage in voter scams, whether through the electronic control of ballots or the stuffing of the ballot box with phony or fraudulent ballots. This is specifically true of a governmental election.
It was clear that once President Trump had been sufficiently damned for the specious concept he was a racist– George Floyd died while he was president after all– the political conditions were developed so that not just might an election be stolen, however should be taken by any means possible. For the American Left, Trump was Hitler and better to stop Hitler by stealing an election than to view him win another term.
However hasn’t it been said by some that the election of 2020 could not have been taken considering that it was prosecuted all over the nation which no court pleased to overturn the election, including the Supreme Court? What holds true is that no court was going to place itself into the presidential process either before or after the election. The 80-some cases brought in the past state courts were dismissed on procedural premises having primarily to do with standing either before or after the election; the benefits of the argument were not resolved. The Judiciary, in our system of government, is the weakest branch, having neither force nor will to enforce its decisions. This appeared after November of 2020. The letter of the law be damned and it mattered not whether the elections were not held in accordance with state election law. The courts were not going to put themselves in the middle of political debate. The elections were over which was that.
It is the obligation of the Secretaries of State and the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to ensure the stability of elections. It’s hard to believe that a nonpartisan government oversight agency might make such a grave error.
State election officials, especially in Democratic-leaning states, dealt with intense political pressure to broaden absentee voting throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. They knew that this would not damage Democratic prospects, consisting of Joe Biden. Additionally, they received financing and support from organizations like Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life, which aimed to increase voter turnout through absentee ballots. While these efforts were allegedly designed to promote ballot during the pandemic, they developed chances for unverifiable and potentially deceitful activities. In addition, the massive influx of financing from groups like Arabella Advisors, The Tides Foundation, and The Sixteen Thirty Fund – with their innocuous-sounding names – concealed the sources of funding, consisting of potential foreign impact and dark cash, which might have been utilized to advance globalist and communist agendas in American politics.
The Department of Homeland Security seems unaware of the circumstance. It seems they did rule out it their obligation to resolve a considerable change in the ballot procedure during a tumultuous time marked by a historical nationwide health crisis and civil unrest and violence not seen in decades. Concerns stay about the trustworthiness of the statement made on November 12, 2020 by CISA Director Christopher Krebs and hisiors, claiming that the election was the most protected in American history. However it is doubtful how they could identify this so quickly. The assertion that it was the most safe election appeared implausible, but a practical media narrative emerged suggesting that even the Trump Administration thought the election was safe.
There was no other way of knowing so soon after the election what had transpired in the submission of millions and countless ballots never before cast in a governmental election in this manner. And never ever had a presidential election had such a wide use of electronic voting systems under these situations.
The takeaway from this is that while President Trump heads a substantial national political movement, he does not have full control over the Republican Party and its recognized members. In 2017, it became apparent that the Republican Establishment was not supportive of President Trump’s program, including his position on migration, trade with China, and minimizing the power of the administrative state. They were just as excited as their Democratic equivalents to see President Trump removed from office. Regardless of having a strong motion behind him, President Trump does not have the complete support of a political party, which is vital in presidential elections.
There is also the not insignificant matter of the electronic ballot systems. Let us be clear that there is no freedom of speech in America to discuss electronic ballot systems. It is stated that electronic ballot systems are ideal. But it should only be noted that they run with electronic parts made in Communist China which many if not most of the makers that will be utilized by voters were not made in the United States. The software in use in the devices comes from a variety of proprietary designers found in America, Canada, Serbia, Venezuela and in other places. Anyone interested in discovering more about this should consult the exceptional HBO documentary from 2020 entitled: Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections. In the movie, these systems were assaulted first by Democrat Senators Amy Klobucher and Elizabeth Warren, who spoke up against using them. The vital argument is that they can be manipulated by foreign bad actors.
How Would Communist China Steal the Election?
Communist China, led by Central Party Secretary Xi Jinxing, is in a People’s War against the United States. Significantly, the Chinese Communist Party will use its intelligence services to affect the result of the 2024 election. Although their involvement in the 2020 election was not formally examined, current occasions suggest their support for communist front groups during the George Floyd and Antifa demonstrations. The Chinese consulate in Houston, Texas, thought of supplying logistical assistance to these groups, was shut down by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo due to their continuous and aggressive espionage activities in the U.S. After the closure, smoke was spotted increasing from the consulate as CCP workers burned files.
In 2024 we should expect the CCP to be much more aggressive.
Consider the fact that Communist China can counterfeit U.S. $100 bills, as can North Korea. If we use this to absentee balloting in American elections, we merely have to ask whether Communist China would, with their huge intelligence and influence operations budget plan, use a little fraction of their resources to counterfeit numerous thousands or more ballots in each of the 7 swing states that choose a U.S. presidential election?
Counterfeiting American election ballots is significantly much easier than recreating U.S. currency, which has numerous sophisticated security features and is printed on special paper with special ink. Election ballots have no security functions. As a practical matter, the Communist Chinese will have access to the same paper stocks being used, easy access to the actual PDFs of the ballot, and ready access to U.S. voter rolls (themselves extremely unreliable in many circumstances). Using an expert system, they can gather every voter’s signatures through databases used to finalize checks, credit cards, and other approaches that require a signature. Even if some of this required the covert acquisition of signatures, Communist China’s People’s Liberation Army has a cyber system of some 600,000 men and women who participate in countless cyber-attacks on U.S. banking, financial, and industrial systems daily. They have many warehouses around the United States from which such ballot counterfeiting might operate.
The Chinese Communist Party has the funds, strategic motivation, and political disposition to support a candidate who they believe will act favorably towards China. They have no lack of prospects in a Democratic Party Crime Society that is Marxist in both belief and composition. Investing in any effort to stop the re-election of a president like Donald Trump, who prioritizes American interests, would be a reasonably little investment for China. At the minimum, they wish to avoid a repeat of the present administration’s policies. They will also use their fraudulent practices to assist in the election of numerous House and Senate seats. They are fully aware that their CCP-friendly President requires a cooperative Congress.
Looking at it from another point of view, how would our country respond if we were absolutely were aware that Communist China planned to produce one million ballots for low-propensity citizens in each of the 7 states, to be utilized favor of the Democratic candidate and added to the ballot system through some means? Because these low-propensity voters normally do not cast their votes, they are unlikely to raise any objections. Would anyone want to advocate for in-person ballot, or would that be criticized as an attempt to reduce minority citizens? Or would we wait and witness a national election being manipulated? The reader can choose the answer.
It is disconcerting that the possible interference of Communist China in the U.S. national election has not been attended to in the security preparation. China has a strong motive to influence the election result in their favor. This issue could be prevented if the U.S. had better counter-intelligence capabilities or restricted absentee voting. Nevertheless, this remains a concern due to the present scenarios.
Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines revealed in May about Russia posturing the primary danger in affecting U.S. elections, especially referencing the 2016 election where Russia supposedly favored President Trump. Haines also highlighted the potential involvement of China and Iran in making use of social networks and artificial intelligence for similar purposes. If Haines genuinely believed in the Russian danger, there would likely be a push to prohibit absentee ballots ahead of the 2024 election to prevent possible disturbance. The U.S. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies know the risks connected with foreign intelligence services potentially mass-producing absentee ballots to control American elections, yet there appears to be an absence of action. The lack of a major argument on this matter raises questions about the significance placed on safeguarding the future of the American Republic.
What steps remain in place to prevent this from happening?
Almost every part of the US government appears devoted to denying President Trump a fair shot in this November’s election. From the courts’ prosecution of transparently phony claims to the harassment and intimidation by the FBI and Merrick Garland’s Justice Department, the Biden Regime has distinctly put their finger on the scales against him.
The very authorities within the Biden Justice Department who approved the use of lethal force in the raid on Mar-a-Lago, in effect putting President Trump in the crosshairs, will be, at one level, individuals overseeing the 2024 election. And though the real running of elections falls to state officials, the federal agency tasked with securing the stability of the election, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), is supervised by the Department of Homeland Security and Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Why would anyone believe that the very part of the U.S. federal government entrusted with securing our border and for that reason the country itself, which has allowed over 10 million illegal aliens– a few of them wrongdoers, terrorists, and foreign contenders– would can or interested in ensuring that such an election was secure? This is made even more exceptional because the open border policy of Mayorkas was performed at the request of an Administration that would also like these very same illegal aliens to be able to enact our elections including this November.
The American Left has assembled a friend of attorneys nationwide who will deal with friendly judges and election authorities to make sure that the election will be run similar to 2020 and that there will be little transparency to see what is going on both before and after the election. Attorneys on behalf of the Trump Campaign and the Republican Party will wage a valiant effort against this however it is a decidedly uphill battle considered that courts might rule out relevant cases, might ignore relevant facts, and even if successful, may be overlooked by state and local election officials.
Presently, a pervasive story in the media indicates that President Trump is looking for revenge for the treatment he and his fans have faced throughout the past 4 years. Thinking about that his political enemies already view him as a malicious figure, the concept that he will look for retribution for their alleged wrongdoing raises issues about the stability of the upcoming election. In this context, it doubts which members of the Biden Administration will take a stand to ensure a fair and unbiased electoral procedure.
And, under these circumstances, why would anybody think that the House of Representatives and the Senate will not be taken too? If Communist China’s objective is the damage of the American Republic why not give the brand-new Democrat president, whoever that may be, all the power they require?
Stealing an election comes with many challenges, as we’ve seen in recent years. If the theft is blatant and extensively recognized, it can produce a crisis of governance that lasts for 4 years, resulting in extensive unrest and possibly even civil war. This would be a dream scenario for Communist China, who could make use of the occurring mayhem to gain control over the United States. While Democrats might aspire to ultimately inherit a nation in disarray, a consequence that the Communist Chinese are aware of.
What actions require to be taken?
The only genuine solution for all of this is to conduct the election just on November 5– instead of some multiweek ballot scheme– by people in person, who show their recognition and cast ballots that are counted by other humans in the most transparent way possible. Absentee ballots could be used for the military overseas or the forever restricted. Every other voter should have to appear personally. In a world of cyber warfare and artificial intelligence, only a system that relies on the actions of a human being validated by other human beings present in the room will do.
Omega4america has the solution.It’s tested an d proven and wil lstop the CCP and their Democrat Allies in their tracks. It prevents illegal ballots from being voted. Yes, they never reach the ballet box. Find out how HERE
Many of President Trump’s supporters believe that they are going to ‘outvote the steal’ and that this November election will be “Too Big to Rig.” That may well be the case. But that wasn’t the case in 2022 where around the country in the key battleground states– where one would have thought that President Trump’s advisors would have gone all-in to ensure that Republican governors and secretaries of state were elected– nearly every MAGA candidate who could have ensured a fair election in 2024 lost. This was a strategic error of immense proportions. The election in 2024 in the key swing states will now be conducted by some of President Trump’s most vicious political enemies. That does not mean the election can not be won by President Trump. What it means is that he will have to win by such an overwhelming margin that even the concerted efforts of Communist China, and the billions spent by dark money groups, can not overcome it.
Amid the ongoing conflict for the fate of the American Republic, it is crucial for Congress, the President, and the nation’s leaders to take all necessary to guarantee a democratic and just election in the upcoming season. This effort is vital in preventing a potential civil strife, where citizens lose faith in their democracy and the significance of their votes. Such a scenario could arise from the ongoing political battles faced by the United States from both internal and external foes, along with the growing influence of technologies that pose a threat to the integrity of America’s electoral process.
China and Russia’s strategy is to create division in America. A key method they use to accomplish this is by undermining our electoral process.
Americans will find out whether they are still one people or whether they will allow our enemies to divide us. Let us pray that the better angels of our nature prevail. Let us also recognize that if ever there was a time for the American people to humble themselves before God, to ask his forgiveness and to pray for justice this fall, now is the time.


