John Livingston, Ph.D
February 12,2024

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is advocating for the elimination of a shocking 7 billion people from the planet in the name of “the greater good.”

Nevertheless, the WEF insists that these severe depopulation objectives can be achieved through “serene” approaches such as mass euthanasia.

Globalists at the unelected company argue that the world’s population need to be minimized to a maximum limitation of 1 billion individuals to “save the world” from “climate change.”

The WEF thinks this substantial sacrifice is vital to ensure that the remaining humans can live an acceptable quality of life.

While numerous professionals argue that growing population numbers are needed to keep a healthy and operating society, the WEF argues that many people will no longer be “required.”

The World Economic Forum (WEF) recommends that the extensive adoption of technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) will lead to a considerable part of the international population becoming redundant in the eyes of the elite.

Elites are now concerned that these “worthless people” will end up being a drain on society as they will no longer have the ability to add to the workforce.

To fight this, the WEF is pushing for mass euthanasia to remove those who are not adding to the “brand-new world order” so that the wealthy elite can live the quality of life they expect.

Over the years, the depopulation plot was buried in all sorts of deceptive stories ranging from “climate change” and holes in the ozone layer to simple messaging that people are having “too many” infants for the planet to manage.

In all of the narratives, the true underlying objective was constantly the exact same: mass depopulation.

Among the latest more explicit calls for genocide came from WEF agenda designer Dennis Meadows of the globalist-led Club of Rome, who specified in no uncertain terms what the globalist plan for the world entails:

To achieve both self-reliance and excellence, our strategy is to decrease our population to one billion people.

We have reached an overall of 7, for that reason we need to come down.

I desire for this process to be progressive, relatively unhurried, and accomplished in a fairly fair manner.

The most affluent 0.1 percent of the global population seek a world where they can grow without the presence of the remaining 99.9 percent, whom they consider unnecessary and troublesome.

Such a world would have extremely “high standards,” rather than today’s low standards with many additional people, so something needs to alter, in Meadows’ view.

Meadows directly and explicitly mentioned his intentions in the above statement, leaving no room for obscurity. Additionally, he provided specific figures to show the variety of people who must be eliminated for him and other globalists to achieve their desired utopia in the world.

Meadows aspires to witness a significant reduction in the planet’s population, from around 8.1 billion people to a simple 1 billion.

He desires 7.1 billion individuals to vanish– equally.

In addition, he mentioned that he hopes for an unified and non-violent resolution, which begs the question, what steps can be required to guarantee a serene result?

Back in 2010, Mark Notaras and Darek Gondor of United Nations University (UNU) wrote a piece about Meadows explaining his plans to limit population growth to “save the world.”

Meadows, a teacher and co-author of “The Limits to Growth,” made statements at that time about how mass depopulation is the only method to guarantee that the world will remain inhabitable moving into the future.

“If the present patterns in world population, industrialization, contamination, food production, and resource deficiency continue the same, the limits to development on this planet will be reached sometime within the next 100 years,” Meadows said at the time.

“At this juncture in our cumulative journey, particular long-held practices have become obsolete, as the world has progressed and the requirements of society have moved.”

It has been almost 14 years because Meadows was priced estimate by these 2 UNU writers as having made such declarations, and even at that time they said it “sounds reasonable” compared to how it would have sounded back in 1972.

In 2010, much of the West had already been indoctrinated into climate cultism as the “final solution” to the problem of human commercial activity, which is apparently “melting” the world– or in today’s vernacular, boiling the oceans.

What he proposed was to gradually and in harmony get rid of billions of people by means of euthanasia.

According to a computational design produced by Meadows and his collaborators, the planet’s capability to support human life was exceeded around 1980, indicating a vital threshold had been crossed.

Because of that time, planetary conditions have degraded to the point that a lot more extreme intervention is required to fix things.

The globalists have a strategy to accomplish their supreme objective using mass depopulation, which involves taking control of the world through violent acts of killing and coercion.