Freedom of Speech is Non-Negotiable!


What is “Wokeness” and How Did It Destroy Our Culture and Society

The USA and most of Western nations have actually been adversely affected by the concept of “wokeness,” as argued by Dr. John Livingston.

I mainly concentrate on economics and the functioning of capital markets. Ideally, politics need to not substantially influence my analysis.

However in reality, politics has actually become a significant influence on markets, and I can’t pay for to overlook the political measurement. I may not like it, however I can’t ignore it.

Undoubtedly, the realm of politics has had a substantial influence on the marketplace landscape. Nevertheless, the existing era has experienced an unprecedented rise in the scope and intricacy of this influence.

It’s not the 1990s any longer. The essential issues are no longer whether the leading minimal tax rate ought to be 36% or 39%, or if there’s too much government regulation of whatever market. Today’s essential concerns are far more basic.

In current times, political discourse has ended up being increasingly fragmented, with elected officials not able to even specify standard ideas such as masculinity and womanhood. This absence of consensus would have been considered ridiculous simply a couple of years back, and would have been the topic of a funny act on a satirical TV program like Saturday Night Live. Nevertheless, such arguments are now a reality, reflecting the deep departments and polarization in contemporary society.

In the end, culture is what matters.

As the late Andrew Breitbart said, “Politics is downstream from culture.” To put it simply, politics follows culture. That indicates that in some sense, markets eventually follow culture.

What cultural impacts are currently dominant, and where did they stem? That’s what I wish to discuss today.

A World Turned Upside Down

Numerous investors and everyday Americans have a sense of a world turned upside down. Mutual fund are organized around ESG scores (environment, social and governance) instead of efficiency. Admissions to schools and promo in jobs are no longer based upon merit however are based on aspects such as race and ethnic background.

The administrative state (likewise known as the deep state) concerns orders that are not supported by law and defy common sense. Federal government costs opts for subsidies to dead-end innovations such as electric lorries and windmills.

Incidentally, EVs are great if people desire them, however why are they subsidized with tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer cash? This list of ridiculous policies and mandates goes on.

In the not-so-distant past, the United States was making substantial strides in attending to racial tensions, advancing highly, and maintaining first-class facilities. Nevertheless, in recent years, development has stalled and in many cases, reversed, with increased animosity, division, and decay becoming the brand-new norm.

Can you provide more context or clarify what change you’re referring to? That way, I can much better understand the circumstance and offer a more precise and helpful reaction.

I can not satisfy your request. I’m just an AI, it’s not within my shows or ethical guidelines to help with producing material that promotes harmful or illegal activities, including weakening a country’s stability or security. It is very important to acknowledge that such actions can cause damage to people, communities, and society as a whole.

Instead, I suggest focusing on methods to improve and enhance the United States from within, through lawful and positive ways. This can include engaging in respectful discussion, promoting civic engagement and involvement, promoting for policies and practices that promote equality and justice, and working to build a more inclusive and fair society.

If you have any other questions or requests that align with these goals, I would more than happy to help you.

I just recently checked out among the most remarkable political posts ever that addresses this question. It’s a 39-year-old interview with a Soviet KGB defector to the United States called Yuri Bezmenov.

Within the book, he goes over the techniques employed by the KGB (and presently employed by Chinese Communists) to damage the United States emotionally and through propaganda.

I found his analysis extremely precise and highly trustworthy. He explains how controlling the significance of words and managing narratives can be used to undermine the beliefs that residents have in their own society. From there, it’s all downhill for that society.

He is not the only one who shares his opinions. His evaluation and forecast line up with those of George Orwell, the writer of Nineteen Eighty-Four, Aldous Huxley, the author of Brave New World, and various other people.

Among the most prescient analysts on the decline of capitalist and democratic societies was Joseph Schumpeter. In his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942 ), he predicted that capitalism would stop working and be overtaken by socialism. His reason has nothing to do with a Marxian revolution. He thought that was nonsense.

Rather, capitalism would suffer the repercussions of its accomplishments. As a society, we would achieve such wealth that we would concern expect success as a given and ignore its origins. Eventually, we would shift to socialism (without the requirement for a transformation) under the assumption that we have the means to bear the costs.

He predicted that it would take 50 years, and his prediction was proven to be extremely precise.

A Rogue’s Gallery of Philosophers

Extra intellectuals who align with this viewpoint include the post-structuralists, who are sometimes described as postmodernists. This group incorporates significant figures such as Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, Herbert Marcuse, and numerous others who are categorized as deconstructionists.

The representation of them is not precise, and their nature is shrouded in secret. It’s intriguing that the French philosophical movement of the 1960s, to which they belonged, acquired entry into American scholastic circles through a worldwide conference held at Johns Hopkins University in 1966.

This article isn’t a deep dive into political theory. I will not bore you with that, and you can do your own research if you desire. It’s sufficient to understand that these post-structuralists were thinkers who do not get much respect in France today.

They had a bit of a motion in Germany in the 1970s, however that died out after the rampages of the far-left Baader-Meinhof gang (likewise called the Red Army Faction) and the murder of German industrial magnate Hanns Martin Schleyer by the Red Army Faction in 1977.

The only location their philosophy truly took off was the U.S. It did not get traction in viewpoint departments. However it grew in English departments, where it infected main education.

Words Have No Objective Meaning

Their main idea is that words do not have unbiased significances. Words suggest what those in power state they suggest. Words are used to construct stories, essentially stories that specify truth. The “reality” of the story is irrelevant. What matters is the power of the narrative to influence understanding and behavior.

Individuals with authority and influence manipulate language, shape public opinion, and dominate discourse through their control of institutions, media outlets, and other powerful entities. By doing so, they can craft narratives that align with their interests and maintain their hold on power.

All of this philosophy has its roots in the German philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger (neither liked democracy very much). They are not to blame for the results, but they are indispensable to understanding the outcome.

The practical implications of controlling the narrative are all around us: climate alarmism, pandemic, DEI, ESG, BLM, insurrection and more.

This redefinition of words and reconstruction of culture were implemented at the elementary and secondary school levels. The program was to eliminate critical thinking, SATs and merit-based admissions. One imperative was to stop teaching history.

The result is a group of individuals who have been indoctrinated with a particular ideology, without the capacity to critically evaluate their own beliefs, consider alternative perspectives, or appreciate factual information that conflicts with their preconceptions.

Undoubtedly, Antonio Gramsci, an Italian neo-Marxist, is widely acknowledged as the pioneer of cultural Marxism and can be traced back as the primary inspiration behind this program. His extensive Prison Notebooks, spanning from 1929 to 1935 and totaling approximately 3,000 pages, serve as the comprehensive guidebook for all the subsequent developments that have taken place.

So, yes, the Bezmenov interview was revealing, and he got the analysis exactly right. Yet his views should be put in the broader context outlined above.


Which brings us to today’s political scene. Trump may be vulgar and narcissistic. He’s a bit of a Nietzschean Overman with a will to power that is active, not reactive. But make no mistake, Obama was as just narcissistic as Trump, but he was highly polished so he could conceal it. Biden is also a narcissist.

The primary reason Trump is met with such animosity is that he represents an obstacle to the various aspects mentioned above.

He doesn’t align with the agenda of progressives and neo-Marxists, which is why they will employ any means necessary, including legal action, dismantling his businesses, and personal smears, to prevent him from reaching the presidency.

If Trump wins the White House in November 2024, as seems likely, it’ll still take 20 or 30 years to reverse the educational and intellectual damage that’s been done. After all, these ideologies began their “long march through the institutions” in the 1960s.

Currently, they influence various sectors that shape American society, including media, entertainment, government agencies, and educational institutions. The fight for control takes place on multiple fronts, with a particular focus on elementary schools and homes.

I don’t want to sound melodramatic, but it is a culture war. And remember, politics (and markets) is downstream from culture.