iSpeakForTrump

Freedom of Speech is Non-Negotiable!

News

Trump Jailed? Will the Crime Family Order Judge to Jail Trump?.

Trump Expects To Be Arrested And Asks For Protest Demonstrations Across The Nation
Trump Expects To Be Arrested And Asks For Protest Demonstrations
Ex-President Donald Trump was punished with a contempt of court fine on Tuesday, and legal experts are warning that if the judge follows through on the threatened prison sentence, it might spark chaotic demonstrations across the country.

Earlier in the day, New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan leveled a $9,000 fine against Trump for breaking the regards to a formerly enforced gag order.

In the written order, Merchan threatened, “Defendant is hereby warned that the Court will not tolerate willful offenses of its lawful orders which if required and appropriate under the situations, it will enforce an incarceratory punishment.”

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s workplace submitted a motion in mid-April to hold Trump in contempt for current Truth Social posts. The motion specified that Trump’s “current social media posts plainly violate the order because they target known witnesses worrying their involvement in this criminal proceeding.”

The Trump project has actually leveled claims of election disturbance versus Democrats, particularly Merchan, pointing out the 4 criminal indictments that have hindered his ability to actively project.

Speaking to the Washington Examiner on Tuesday, legal analyst and corporate basic counsel Alton Harmon stated, “Judge Merchan is running within his discretion, but I believe he would be an automaton if he didn’t value that the world is viewing him and how any jail time would be seen by most as real election interference– not in the hyperbolic way that Trump routinely states this trial is amounting to by its extremely presence.”

Former federal district attorney Neama Rahani stated to the Washington Examiner that the possibility of President Trump being sent to prison appeared slim, however it could result in extensive presentations and even social condition.

Harmon discussed that he believes it would cause strong displeasure and nationwide presentations from his advocates.

Former Massachusetts Superior Court Associate Justice Shannon Frison recommends Attorney Merchan to consider the potential for civil condition when rendering judgments.

“I believe you need to,” she said. “Given the impact that he has on what we call his base, a sector of Republicans– I think that him [Trump] being incarcerated for any quantity of time for any behavior would definitely have some result [on the general pub

lic’s reaction]”

The Trump files case centers around allegations that Trump had his then-lawyer Michael Cohen pay to adult performer Stormy Daniels, real name Stephanie Clifford, on the condition she avoid discussing an affair, which Trump has denied. Trump has actually been implicated of falsifying service records to hide the payments.
Trump appeared to call Bragg’s bluff. Trump stated in April that it would be a “GREAT HONOR” to end up being a “modern-day Nelson Mandela” in the “clink” for speaking the fact about Merchan.

The gag order forbids Trump from making public statements that could possibly interfere with the trial, including remarks about witnesses, counsel aside from Bragg, court and district attorney staff, and their family members. In addition, the order applies to prospective jurors.

“The gag order has to come off,” Trump formerly informed press reporters outside the Manhattan courthouse. “People are permitted to speak about me, and I have a gag order, simply to show you how much more unfair it is.”A criminal plan to corrupt the 2016 presidential election.”

That’s the criminal offense prosecutor Matthew Colangelo – a top authorities in Joe Biden’s Justice Department till he joined the Manhattan district attorney’s office to prosecute Donald Trump – declared recently Trump had actually dedicated.

That “scheme” is why Trump faces 34 New York state felony charges for “falsifying company records,” a crime that is usually a misdemeanor, Colangelo said in his opening statement to the Manhattan jury that will decide if Trump is guilty.

Colangelo’s participation in the New York case is not prohibited so far as I know, however it casts in bold relief the main risk the case versus Trump poses, namely, the signature of banana republic governance– the party in power manipulating the justice system to kneecap the party out of power. This is a poison and a blight our country has not faced before.

In the middle of April, Richard L. Hasen, a specialist on election law with left-leaning views, expressed in the Los Angeles Times that he believed the charges in New York were not considerable adequate to have a significant influence on the presidential race.

Hasen’s assessment was rather precise. The allegations are fairly little in scale. Nevertheless, the manner in which the prosecution is presenting the situation is substantial. Democratic district attorneys at the local level are aiming to have Trump, a member of the Republican celebration, jailed for an act they consider as an offense, which basically comes down to defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

Win or lose, their effort may destabilize the American legal system for decades.

The goal is not just to penalize Trump for his victory in 2016, which still angers the Democratic Party, however primarily to impede his re-election project this year. This remains in order to guarantee the triumph of an out of favor and aging incumbent who would likely not win, as even reported by CNN.

Regional prosecutors, liable solely to the local electorate in a primarily Democratic county, are not merely pushing the borders of a state law. They are intentionally applying it in a manner designed to punish a Republican political figure for their actions throughout their presidential campaign – the sole across the country election in the United States.

In fact, the real criminal offense Trump apparently dedicated is almost farcical in its unimportance. He apparently misclassified $420,000 in expenditures in internal accounting records as “legal services” when they were really compensations for payments that his lawyer Michael Cohen made on his behalf.

Seamy, for sure. And in 2021, Pecker consented to pay $187,500 to settle a [civil] Federal Election Commission examination into whether the payment to MacDougal was a prohibited project contribution.

It will be crucial that Trump’s attorneys persuade the judge to charge the jury that making hush money payments to eliminate a story is not illegal. Whether they can do so with this judge quite stays to be seen. But it’s important due to the fact that Bragg’s opportunities of convicting Trump depend almost completely on making the jury believe that Trump is a bad man and is worthy of to be punished, even if the real case presented more closely resembles a Rube Goldberg gizmo than a coherent legal theory– a case Jonathan Turley makes in this must-read piece.

Presume the prosecutors are correct. Presume Trump’s only motive for concealing his affairs [including prominently the one with Stormy Daniels] was to improve the opportunities he would win the 2016, that he didn’t wish to keep them secret for some other reason.

Which presumption, by the way, beats this prosecution all by itself, because no affordable juror could conclude beyond a sensible doubt that Trump paid the hush money primarily to influence voters about his character rather than for the much more common factor, to wit, to keep it from his spouse.

Suppose he interacted with Pecker and the National Enquirer to conceal MacDougal’s story.

The query remains, What’s the point? Why is Trump facing trial?

Hillary Clinton’s project in 2016 utilized campaign finances to cover the expenses of the widely known “Steele dossier,” a research file that incorrectly linked Trump to Russia. This ought to not be considered as a conspiracy theory. By 2022, Clinton’s project and the Democratic National Committee had paid a fine of $113,000 to the FEC to deal with a probe relating to these expenditures.

Clinton’s project then worked with friendly wire service to plant stories based upon that research …

If Donald Trump is being arraigned for his 2016 shenanigans, why isn’t Hillary Clinton?

Ummmmmm, because when a Democrat does it, it’s okay, but when Donald Trump does it, it’s nearly 3 dozen felonies?

For regional district attorneys to attempt to turn what are most technical legal violations into felonies on the basis that Donald Trump wished to keep his private affairs private in a presidential election is a harmful overreach.

That’s understating it. We see overreaching all the time in campaigns. Indeed, we see plenty of outright lying (and Trump isn’t guitless either, not of that). But what we have not seen up to now in this country is the in-party dragooning the fearsome power of prosecution to cripple the opponent of the out-party.

The New York Times argued convincingly this weekend in a long piece (paywalled) that Trump’s view of the United States and the American justice system has darkened considerably since 2016.

But what the Times didn’t acknowledge is that Trump now has every reason to view American law as hopelessly politicized and prosecutors as targeting him. Whatever the strengths and weaknesses of the three other indictments Trump faces, the Manhattan case is a travesty, a poison pill that no amount of sugarcoating can hide.

The potential consequences of the Manhattan prosecution pose a significant threat to the integrity of the justice system and the democratic process. If Trump loses the election, many people may attribute his defeat to the politically motivated case and the biased media coverage that followed, which could undermine trust in the legal system and create widespread disillusionment.

Win or lose, the Manhattan district attorney’s office has made a terrible mistake. At best, it has opened the way for partisan local prosecutors in all 50 states to look for any excuse to interfere in federal elections.

If Trump is successful in the upcoming election, he will have the authority to deploy federal law enforcement against those who have committed massive federal crimes in their attempt to interfere in his camapign and eh civilrights of all Americans. . While he refrain from doing so, following this legal accusation, it would be challenging for anyone to resist the urge. Moreover MAGA will demand it. MAGA has had enough and wants the woke, commie Leftists driven out of government, the media and our institutions. The only question is whether Trump will allow that to occur.

The legacy media outlets are refusing to excuse these brazen attempts to incite immense discontent, which is intended to disrupt the upcoming November Election. We rely on alert individuals like you to bring attention to such corruption. We implore you to join our ranks as a free member of I Speak for Trump and use our resources to share this information with your network of contacts, good friends, and anyone else who may gain from it. Together, we can clarify this problem and produce a brighter future.

You’ll get free access to premium content and podcasts without any advertisements to disrupt your experience and the ability to engage directly in the campaign to restore Donald J. Trump to the White House and to evict the organized crime syndicate masquerading as the Democratic Party.