Most Federal Employees Are Embedded Members of the Organized Crime Syndicate Masquerading as the Democratic Party.

More than half of federal employees are determined to undermine Trump, and most Democratic federal supervisors are preparing to oppose Trump’s initiatives.

A current Napolitan Institute and RMG Research survey found that nearly all federal government managers who supported Harris oppose the Trump administration’s policies. Eighty percent suggest they will actively resist them, and only a tiny fraction, 1%, reveal a determination to offer some support.

During the 12 years of the Obama and Biden regimes, the federal bureaucracy was staffed by fully vetted members of the organized crime syndicate masquerading as the Democratic UniParty. They are in government not to serve the people or the Constitution of the United States but the interests of the left wing oligarchs and crime bosses. Who, in return, enrich them with bloated federal salaries, benefits and pensions, and lucrative positions once they retire. This strategy has placed vetted “made men and women” of the crime syndicate on 650 federal judges out of only 837. This is the empowerment that will oppose MAGA and Trump at every opportunity. They must be removed; otherwise, our nation will be reduced to ashes, as their incompetence, greed, and fraud have already reduced much of Los Angeles.

Entitled “Concealed in Clear View: The Democratic Plan to Solidify Control in Trump’s Presidency,” Amuse authored it on X.

The Biden administration is supposedly trying to undermine a possible Trump second term by strategically placing Democratic followers in crucial positions across federal firms. This “burrowing” method involves converting temporary political appointees into irreversible government employees just before a new administration takes control. The practice of burrowing has been a concern given the Reagan age when outgoing authorities from the Carter administration attempted to seal their legacy by changing short-lived appointees into career bureaucrats. Since then, burrowing has become controversial during presidential shifts, particularly when the party in power modifications. By embedding partisan operatives in companies, they can exert lasting influence while enjoying the job security afforded by civil service defenses.

While the media typically brushes this off as regular staffing, the reality is a deliberate attempt to embed ideological allies deep inside the federal government, prepared to resist future policy changes.

Inspired by the late William F. Buckley’s iconic phrase, we must step decisively to halt the intensifying administrative decay. Under has become a symbol of decreasing mental acuity, a staggering influx of over 1,000 partisans appointed into essential federal positions, essentially getting away from public scrutiny due to a glaring regulative loophole. If existing trends continue, this number might swell to an incredible 3,000 by the end of his term, a dismal standard that even the notoriously administrative administration of Barack Obama failed to exceed.

This is no coincidence but a determined attack on the federal government’s facilities. Producing professional positions was planned to protect governance from the volatility of elections, ensuring stability and connection through nonpartisan management. However, Democrats have masterfully controlled this system to their benefit, transforming it into a powerful tool. By strategically putting loyal allies in apparently neutral functions, they have constructed a policy barrier that is resistant to changes in administration. The Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, will face a complicated task in overcoming this obstacle. Musk, an experienced innovator with a track record of eliminating administrative inefficiencies in industries such as area exploration and electric vehicles, brings a much-needed disruptive approach to taking on federal government waste. Ramaswamy, a savvy business owner and outspoken critic of the administrative state, integrates policy knowledge with a tireless dedication to reform. They embody the non-traditional leadership needed to challenge a federal labor force deeply entrenched with partisan loyalists. As the DOGE group presents reforms, the ingrained operatives will outwardly appear cooperative but secretly utilize every bureaucratic method to ward off development. From interminable procedural delays to obscure regulative analyses, they will use the federal government’s equipment to block change. The Biden administration has comprehended a lesson that Trump found out too late in 2016: these operatives are not passive spectators but rather partisan agents who utilize their positions to withstand, obstruct, and weaken conservative reforms.

Although the law mandates that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) inform Congress about the circumstances of burrowing, neither the OPM, your House Committee on Oversight and Reform, nor the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has revealed these details. Transparency in this matter is necessary as it benefits the general public and can help prevent possible abuse of power.

The process itself has progressed since the Carter administration. Initially, burrowing accompanied little oversight. However, growing issues about abuse triggered the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to execute more stringent evaluations. By the Reagan period, the practice got attention, particularly when outbound Carter appointees were fast-tracked into civil service functions. Over time, the process became more formalized, needing multi-tiered reviews to ensure compliance with working with guidelines. Yet, loopholes, such as insufficient reporting and bypassing OPM entirely, permit agencies to exploit the system, making today’s burrowing efforts a lot more nontransparent and problematic. Today, agencies must request OPM whenever they seek to hire an existing political appointee or one who has served in a political position within the past 5 years. OPM then performs multi-level reviews of each application to ensure the conversion follows federal working guidelines.
Nevertheless, this process is far from airtight. Companies have bypassed OPM entirely and converted political appointees without appropriate review. When this happens, OPM performs retroactive examinations and, if essential, issues corrective actions, such as re-advertising the position. Significantly, the U.S. Court of Appeals just recently upheld the shooting of an appointee who had been poorly converted into a career function without OPM oversight.

The Obama administration’s comprehensive burrowing in 2016 created such a severe issue that the OPM updated its rules in 2018. These new standards required companies to inform OPM of any attempted burrowing, but compliance remains inconsistent. Agencies often skirt these requirements, and a glaring loophole exacerbates the problem: the Biden administration can hire loyalists from Biden and Harris’s governmental campaigns—a combined pool of over 10,000 Democratic operatives who can be fast-tracked into professional roles.

This month alone, the federal government included around 60,000 brand-new workers– a shocking number. Covert amongst them are most likely 2,000 to 3,000 Democrat loyalists being quietly “burrowed” into civil service positions. Protected from public scrutiny, these hires will serve as obstacles to Trump’s incoming administration, using the sheer volume of federal work to obscure their existence within the bureaucracy.

The FBI, led by Director Christopher Wray, is facing a challenging situation as he nears the end of his tenure. With the upcoming transition to a new administration, Wray’s remaining time at the bureau is far from uneventful. Following Wray’s departure, Deputy Director Paul Abbate is anticipated to assume temporary leadership until the Senate confirms Trump’s choice, potentially Kash Patel. However, Wray still has a surprise move to make before he leaves his position.

The Washington Times reports that Wray has begun promoting senior officials into protected positions within the Senior Executive Service (SES), burrowing them deep within the FBI. This move is calculated to obstruct Trump’s reforms, ensuring that Patel faces resistance from entrenched bureaucrats loyal to the status quo. Sources within the bureau describe this as a deliberate effort to create a partisan leadership structure immune to Trump’s oversight.
Adding to the challenge, there are reports that Wray is formulating a plan to delay Patel’s entry into the agency by three to four months. Such a delay is critical to Wray’s strategy because it would give entrenched bureaucrats time to consolidate their influence, entrench their positions, and sabotage any incoming reforms. The additional months would allow Wray’s allies to set up internal roadblocks, bury critical information, and create a culture of defiance that would be difficult to dismantle. For Trump’s administration, these delays mean that Patel will face an already fortified internal opposition when he assumes leadership. Such a delay could severely hamper Trump’s ability to clean house at the FBI, giving Wray’s allies time to entrench themselves even further.

This initiative does not consider the numerous Democratic supporters who worked for the Biden and Harris campaigns and are now being discreetly recruited as full-time government staff in the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation. The potential dangers of this strategy are significant, particularly in light of Trump’s well-founded lack of confidence in the bureau due to past instances of biased investigations and information leaks. Despite this, Wray shows no signs of being discouraged, believing that the lack of action from Congress will enable his proposal to be successful.

If Wray’s gambit works, Patel will face an uphill battle. Burrowed FBI officials could leak information, resist directives, and create endless delays without fear of repercussions. This would be disastrous for Trump’s efforts to restore the FBI’s integrity and embolden dangerous elements within the bureaucracy.

Establishing Responsibility
The act of burrowing is not just a minor detail; it is a strategic move in the Left’s ongoing effort to embed its beliefs within the government system. This tactic is crucial for Democrats and key to their long-term plan to gain and maintain power. Republicans need to react with a clear understanding of the situation and a plan that focuses on openness, responsibility, and change.
It is essential to ensure that one party does not control the administrative state while pretending to be unbiased. If conservatives want to achieve lasting success, they must address this covert embedding directly. The battle for America’s future is not limited to elections; it also occurs in the halls of power, where individuals entrench themselves and bide their time.

Trump’s victory on November 5th marks the beginning of a new chapter, but the fight is far from over. As he prepares to take office on January 20th, his administration must be ready for its entrenched opposition. Government machinery has been rigged, and restoring accountability will require bold, decisive action. Anything less would be surrender.