Freedom of Speech is Non-Negotiable!


Ex-CIA Agent Says Intel Community Will Interfere Again in 2024 Election

A professor from Georgetown University, who has experience as a CIA intelligence analyst for 12 years, cautions that the concentrate on variety, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and the increasing influence of politics within the intelligence neighborhood have ended up being a popular issue. He strongly thinks that these companies will try to intervene in the 2024 election, just as they carried out in the previous election in 2020.

“My guess is that the proverbial deep state within the intelligence neighborhood will reemerge due to the fact that probably a Republican candidate will once again be viewed as a hazard to the internal policies that numerous intelligence individuals like,” Dr. John Gentry, author of the new book, “Neutering the CIA: Why United States Intelligence Versus Trump Has Long-Term Consequences,” told Fox News Digital.

Within days of the explosive New York Post story exposing the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop computer in the run-up to the 2020 election, 51 former intelligence officials signed a letter trying to reject the laptop, claiming it “has all the timeless earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

According to Gentry, the act of reducing the significance of the Hunter Biden laptop was seemingly driven by political intentions. He further mentioned that a reliable insider explicitly notified him that this was made with the specific purpose of benefiting the Biden campaign.

According to him, there have been transfer the past couple of weeks suggesting that people who are presently or previously related to intelligence agencies might be participating in 2024. It is completely possible these representatives will perform an incorrect flag occasion to dissuade individuals from voting for Trump, or perhaps delay or cancel the November election.

“I long have actually believed we are most likely to again see former intelligence officers be politically active against Trump or whomever the Republican presidential candidate is next year, and I anticipate leaking to resume,” Gentry stated. “The activities of ‘formers’ have actually resumed currently, a bit before I expected.”

Dr. Gentry referenced a piece composed by Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA officer who worked on the Hunter Biden laptop computer job, and Asha Rangappa, a previous FBI staff member, that highlighted Trump’s public declarations throughout his campaign and defining them as “unsafe to democracy.”

“Gentry thinks it’s important to keep a close eye on people like Asha Rangappa, who have a history of speaking out versus Trump and have held positions of authority, such as working for the FBI. While Rangappa may not have received as much attention as other prominent figures, Gentry believes she still requires tracking due to her past actions, consisting of signing the controversial ‘Laptop 51’ letter, which has actually been absolutely


During a thorough discussion on the politicization of U.S. intelligence, Dr. Gentry highlighted a noteworthy case that foreshadowed the CIA’s increasing participation in domestic political affairs.

He highlighted the remarks made by ex-CIA Deputy Michael Morrell during the 2016 presidential race in between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

Morrell said before the national election that, “My training as an intelligence officer taught me to call it as I see it. This is what I provided for the CIA. This is what I am doing now. Our nation will be much safer with Hillary Clinton as president.”

In spite of the issues expressed by the intelligence neighborhood, Donald Trump, the future president, would go on to lead a time of comparatively calm global relations, making sure that the United States did not end up being associated with significant foreign conflicts.

Dr. Gentry, who did not support Donald Trump in either election and who has no plans to support him in any future election, said on this unsuitable election interference.

Dr. Gentry pointed out that the quote discussed above was composed by Donald Trump quickly after he became the nominee in August 2016.

“He mentioned that the statement was incorrect in 2 methods. First of all, Morrell and other intelligence officers do offer their honest evaluations on foreign intelligence matters, but the statement was referring to domestic problems, which is not within the CIA’s province.”

“And secondly, no CIA officer ever suggests policy to Americans, much less recommending the policy choice of a citizen option,” he added. “This would be the first of a variety of cases in which truth became an issue, both on the part of Mr. Trump and on the part of his critics.”

It must be included that the CIA was dramatically politicized under former CIA Director John Brennan, who has because been given an open platform in significant news media outlets like the Washington Post and on MSNBC to discuss domestic politics, and in particular, to espouse their negative view of Donald Trump.

Brennan, despise his recognized communist views, was not only permitted into the CIA but rose to its highest position under former President Barack Obama. An October 2020 piece in the Washington Post composed by David Ignatius exposed how Brennan had excoriated Donald Trump in a bid to persuade Americans to avoid him in the upcoming election.

In his literary work, “Undaunted,” Brennan knocked Trump’s interactions with Putin at their Helsinki meeting as “bordering on treason” and asserted that Trump was completely under the control of Putin. This caused Trump withdrawing Brennan’s security clearance, which had actually been given to him previously, and even more intensified the existing animosity in between the two people.

Brennan played a key function in the controversial examination into Donald Trump’s alleged ties with Russia, which began during Obama’s presidency and continued for numerous years. The investigation, which was based upon unproven intelligence, aimed to reject Trump’s project and presidency. The CIA’s dubious claims suggested that Trump was possibly dealing with the Russian government, fueling public unrest and demonstrations on the day of his inauguration. This series of events raises concerns about using intelligence agencies to affect political outcomes.

Gentry also indicated the execution of DEI policies at key intelligence organizations, consisting of the CIA, as a signal that the leading foreign intelligence company was moving focus far from day-to-day operations towards a more “woke” political agenda.

“It was an effort half a century earlier to get more women and minorities into the intelligence community,” Gentry said. “This was done under the rubric of affirmative action. It gradually ended up being more of a policy through the Clinton administration. However it took a significant advance, or not, depending on your point of view, when President Obama signed an executive order created to enhance diversity and inclusion in the federal labor force.”

During his time at the CIA, Gentry guaranteed Fox News Digital that discussions about personal political views were not a part of the agency’s culture. However, he learned from intelligence community sources during the Obama administration that the standard of preventing political involvement was no longer being maintained which political participation had actually ended up being prevalent.

According to Gentry, John Brennan, who previously acted as CIA Director, and James Clapper, who formerly held the position of Director of National Intelligence, played substantial functions in politicizing intelligence firms. Presently, William J. Burns holds the position of CIA Director.

According to Gentry, Brennan and Clapper were ardent fans of President Obama’s plan to reinvent the federal labor force. As a result, they took actions to accelerate the procedure and executed different policies targeted at improving variety and inclusion, such as targeted recruitment initiatives and encouraging workers to become more politically engaged, consisting of in Brennan’s case, promoting political advocacy.

Gentry observed that the incorporation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts and political considerations within intelligence companies has negatively affected staff morale among lower-level workers.

“Many people are dissatisfied with the situation, as they think it is presenting political programs into the office and producing tension among employees who support or oppose variety, equity, and addition policies,” Gentry stated.

Throughout the Obama administration, issues about “soft totalitarianism” emerged, credited to Brennan’s leadership and policies. This phenomenon drew parallels with authoritarian programs like the Soviet Union and China, and had ramifications for both performance and credibility.

Gentry stated that he composed his book so that the American individuals and policy makers “appreciate that there is a considerable political issue within the agencies.”

“So, put all these things together, and I’m quite confident that we’ll see a reemergence of advocacy,” Gentry remarked.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x