iSpeakForTrump

Freedom of Speech is Non-Negotiable!

News

Donald Trump was first arraigned a year ago, on April 4, 2023,…

Donald Trump was first arraigned almost a year ago, on April 4, 2023, when Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced charges versus the former president over a nondisclosure contract Trump used to buy the silence of porn actress Stormy Daniels, with whom he had obviously had a short sexual encounter. Bragg, a chosen Democrat, won workplace by guaranteeing to pursue Trump, and go after Trump he did.

Reanimating a claims that more responsible police had actually decreased to prosecute, Bragg developed 34 felony counts versus Trump, each of which brought a maximum sentence of four years in prison, which in theory would lead to 134 years behind bars for the former president. On Monday, Judge Juan Merchan revealed that the trial will begin April 15.

The indictment was weak in a range of ways. First, the primary charge, that Trump falsified organization records in 2016, was a misdemeanor with a two-year statute of constraints. Even if Bragg might somehow jack the charges into a felony, which brings a five-year statute of restrictions, the time in which Trump

Trumpto Likely To Be Convicted Of A Non-Crim,E In Crime Family;S Desperate Bid Tostop Him
Trump May Be Convicted Of A Non-Crime In Crome Family’S Desperate Atte,Pt To Stop Him
could be charged had passed.

But wait– during the pandemic, when courts practically shut down, New York, in a one-time-only

Trumpto Likely To Be Convicted Of A Non-Crim,E In Crime Family;S Desperate Bid Tostop Him
Trump May Be Convicted Of A Non-Crime In Crome Family’S Desperate Atte,Pt To Stop Him
relocation, extended its statute of constraints to 6 years, which permitted Bragg to get the Trump charges in right under the wire.

Bragg argued that Trump could only be charged with a felony if he devoted another criminal activity together with the misdemeanor of falsifying records. However, Bragg did not explicitly state what the other criminal activity was. He appeared to be basing his argument on the unproven idea that Trump broke federal election law, a theory that had previously stopped working in a similar case including John Edwards. As a local district attorney, Bragg did not have the jurisdiction to impose federal election laws.

The case has legal problems, along with getting in a new phase of political significance.

Before April 4, 2023, no one knew how being prosecuted may affect Trump’s candidateship for the Republican governmental election. At that time, Trump led GOP challenger Ron DeSantis by around 15 points. After Bragg’s indictment, Trump’s support soared and DeSantis’ support trended downward. A 15-point lead became a 30-point lead.

Subsequent indictments have either even more increased Trump’s assistance among Republican primary citizens or had no impact at all. Those citizens have processed the whole indictment issue, and lots of have concluded that the charges are politically encouraged attacks by chosen Democrats, like Bragg or Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis, or by the unique counsel picked by the Biden administration, Jack Smith.

In all, Trump, now the presumptive Republican nominee, is in a more powerful place politically than he was before he was first indicted. As he said in an recent interview, “Who would have believed that?”

The legal proceedings against Trump are set to advance to the trial phase, with a jury composed of Manhattan locals, understood for their liberal leanings, most likely to discover him guilty on a few of the charges. The concern now is, what will result from such a conviction?

That is the prospect that raises Democratic hopes, at least for now. They have seen a number of polls that show some portion of citizens who are now available to choose Trump state that they would not elect him if he were a found guilty felon.

The Bragg indictment holds substantial capacity from a project viewpoint. It can portray Trump as a criminal before the election, while other legal cases against him are facing hold-ups. Democrats see Bragg as a potential influencer in shifting citizens towards supporting Biden.

Or perhaps not. There is another Trump conviction political scenario. Back when Bragg indicted the former president, some Democrats were uneasy with the reality that the first of a number of anticipated indictments versus Trump was likewise the weakest case. Democrats called, as well as anyone else, that Bragg’s case is a bad one, and some were concerned that by going first, the weakest case would cause some citizens to dismiss all the Trump prosecutions as weak and politically inspired.

Now, what if the impact of a conviction in the Bragg case is to lessen the prosecution and not the accused? And then, by extension, to reduce all of the prosecutions versus Trump? Not in the eyes of the Democratic base or lots of in the media, naturally– absolutely nothing would lessen their opposition to Trump– however, in the eyes of citizens who may seriously be thinking about electing Trump as the much better of the binary option with Biden.

I discovered from experience that it is highly likely the jury will NOT vote to convict. There is even an outside chance it will acquit Trump. Regardless, the law under which he is being attempted is a clear infraction of the ex post facto stipulation of the United States Constitution. It just takes one juror to agree, and the case is hung. Trump will declare it a victory, and jury selection is vital. I find it hard to believe, given the chaos that has engulfed NYC, that there is not one juror who does not suffer from TDS. This case is going to backfire big time on the organized crime family masquerading as the Democratic Party. The only method they can use to pull this off is to have a completely intimidated jury.

I am not stating that will take place. But I am stating that up until now, the Democratic lawfare campaign against Trump has had some unintended effects, and there is no factor to think that, once a trial starts, everything will lastly start going according to the Democratic strategy. There could be more surprises to come.