Democratic Crime Family Judge Merchan Fixes the Jury Instructions
President Trump: “Mother Teresa Could Not Beat These Charges’ Jury Begins Deliberating as Weeks-Long Sham Trial Nears End After Biden Judge Issues Stunning Instructions to Jurors
Jury directions concluded Wednesday early morning, and the jury was dismissed to begin considerations in the extraordinary case against previous President Donald Trump– N.Y. v Trump.
In the courtroom, George Washington University Law Professor John Turley stated that Merchan had released an entirely biased and unprecedented set of instructions to the jury.
Merchan delivered the coup de grace guideline. He said that there is no need to settle on what happened. They can disagree on what the criminal activity was among the 3 choices. Hence, this means that they could divide 4-4-4, and he will still treat them as consentaneous. This instruction is clearly and unequivocally contrary to law and precedent and will be overturned on appeal.
So a dead misdemeanor for falsifying company records was zapped back into life by declaring that under NY election law 17-152 it was done to affect the election by the illegal means of falsification of organization records. It is so circular as to produce vertigo. So, the jury discovered some files were falsified by unlawful means of falsifying other files. That is only one of 3 possible crimes, and the jury does not need to decide which was the basis for their conviction.
The lack of witnesses to media practices is becoming increasingly more substantial. Such a witness might have talked about how stories are frequently eliminated or planted by projects because of journalism exceptions for standard practices by the media. Instead, the prosecutor could state as truth what the typical media practices remain in a campaign.
This violates every principle of the Due Process Clause and criminal procedure known to man. (Or of the Privileges & Immunities Clause according to Justice Thomas’s view.)
Merchan’s method stops working to offer a proper warning. Notifying an accused that the jury can pick the criminal activity is not only unfair, it is unprecedented and wholly and entirely illegal.
The ruling contradicts the fundamental principle of consentaneous jury decisions. Judge Merchan would gain from revisiting the landmark Supreme Court case of Ramos v. Louisiana, which developed an essential precedent on this matter just four years ago.
The problem is not whether Judge Merchan has leaped the shark but the number of sharks he’s jumped. It’s already past the point of absurdity.
Judge Merchan notified the jury that unanimity is not needed for a conviction. He described that the jury might have various groups agreeing on separate criminal offenses and would consider this a unanimous decision.
Judge Juan Merchan’s gag order, which goes against the Constitution, infringes on President Trump’s freedom of speech as safeguarded by the First Amendment is unlawful.
Sen. J.D. Vance has called the entire trial and jury instructions evidence of Merchan’s criminal activity. He has called for a full-scale investigation of the judge to determine how much this whole effort has been coordinated with the Biden Campaign or the White House to influence the November election. Sen. Vancde is convinced that grave crimes have been committed by Merchan, Bragg, Colangelo, and the rest of the Trump prosecution team. Congress needs to get to the bottom of it quickly.
The limiting order issued by Judge Juan Merchan infringes upon President Trump’s freedom of speech, as secured by the First Amendment, and appears to be an unlawful limitation.
Trump speaks to the media as the jury begins to deliberate in the New York “hush money” trial:
Mother Theresa could not survive these accusations … this whole circumstance is unfair. The Judge is so prejudiced that he is unable to make a reasonable decision.
“I took a huge lead in the polls over the last few weeks. Something is going on. Since I believe individuals of this country see that this is a rigged offer.”
“Then they have a demonstration with Robert De Niro the other day who is a broken down fool. He got MAGA ‘d yesterday. He got a huge dosage of it.”
“Don’t forget the significance of November 5, a date that will decrease in our nation’s history books. On the other hand, it’s clear that this trial is heavily discriminatory and unjust.”
Merchan supplied the last directive. Merchan made the unprecedented ruling that everybody doesn’t have to be on the same page about what took place. The jury members can have varying opinions on which of the 3 choices constitutes criminal activity; still, a 4-4-4 split would be considered a consentaneous choice by him.
A misdemeanor charge for falsifying business records, which was dismissed, was restored by claiming that it was done to affect the election unlawfully under NY election law 17-152. This scenario is so complicated that it may trigger lightheadedness. The jury determined that specific documents were falsified unlawfully. This is just one of three potential criminal offenses, and the jury is not required to agree on which criminal activity led to their conviction.
The absence of a witness to talk about media treatments is increasingly essential. This witness might have resolved how news stories are regularly suppressed or manipulated by projects under the guise of media practices. Instead, the district attorney was permitted to assert as fact typical media practices require throughout a project while openly slamming Judge Merchan and his clear financial stake in the event against
Merchan has acted as a biased judge, which is not against the law. However, it is prohibited to function as a biased judge when it benefits your family economically, and in this case, his family is profiting from this trial.
