By John Livingston
January 12, 2025

Inbound President Donald Trump appears to be genuinely considering adding Greenland to the United States as its 51st state. Significantly,, the acquisition would likely be more financially feasible than one might anticipate.
Greenland And The Art of The Deal
What’s the specific difference? Chanel Rion from One America News Network crunched the numbers, exposing a staggering shortfall of roughly $57 billion. Put in perspective. that’s only 15 billion more than Musk’s purchase of Twitter. Perhaps Musk lends the money in return for a part of the profits, or, far better, let private Americans fund it. After all, the Biden Crime family has sent nearly 165 Billion to the Nazi crooks in Kviv to keep them silent about the monstrous crimes and billions of dollars the crime syndicate masquerading as the Democratic Party has laundered through its banks and other entities.

The sum is equivalent to the cost of distributing a million dollars to every citizen of Greenland, from the youngest kid to the earliest grownup. Notably, a simple majority of 51 percent is required for Greenland to acquire independence from Denmark, a possibility that Politico recommends might come true as early as April, coinciding with the island’s upcoming parliamentary elections.

A 2009 agreement with the Kingdom of Denmark specifies that it can declare independence that way, and Greenlandic Prime Minister Mute Egede stated during his New Year’s Day message that he was preparing to request it.

“Our cooperation with other nations, and our trade relations, can not continue to take place exclusively through Denmark,” he stated, including that it was time to shake off colonial “shackles.”

While the relocation didn’t call for Trump to be their rescuer, the reality that this is occurring in tandem with Trump’s inauguration can’t be a coincidence.

Trump, after all, has stated that he believes “the ownership and control of Greenland [by the United States] is an absolute necessity.” Also, Don Jr. visited the island in the run-up to the new administration taking office:
Greenland and the Art of The Deal
Unlike conversations about Canada or the Panama Canal, which may no longer be as enjoyable with Justin Trudeau’s imminent departure and the upcoming election of a brand-new leader for the Liberal Party, Greenland is a possible alternative.
Rion highlighted that the cost of running Greenland, a place with about 60,000 locals, is fairly small and does not need to impact our financial resources significantly. On the other hand, the benefits are substantial.

“Greenland has not broken away from Denmark because it’s financially reliant on them. Denmark gives Greenland a yearly budget of about $511 million U. S. dollars, approximately,” Rion stated throughout her segment

“This accounts for over half of Greenland’s public spending plan. And though Greenland is abundant in natural resources, Denmark appears to have used environmentalism as an excuse to hold the island back,” she included.

“Perhaps the Danes understand the minute Greenland ends up being practical; it’ll break away. Maybe it’s that Denmark just does not have the chops to establish their golden goose, and so they would rather feed it, like a distant family pet. And while most of Greenland is uninhabitable, it is an icy treasure land of uncommon minerals and energy.”

These resources aren’t simply a golden goose: “Greenland has considerable deposits of zinc, lead, gold, diamonds, and rare earth, like lithium and graphite. The last two are essential for electric automobiles, turbines, and other clean energy products,” Rion noted. “Currently, China has monopolized extracting these uncommon components. That’s an issue.”
‘
There are also substantial oil and gas deposits off of its coast, something the U.S. might use to keep it and its allies energy-independent.
Denmark might receive the funds for one million dollars per person, and the surplus could be designated for enhancing facilities. This quantity is even lower than the assistance provided to Ukraine.
Greenland and The Art of The Deal
And Rion isn’t the only one penetrating the opportunity. In a report the day after Rion’s section aired, The Economist also noted that if “America provided merely our crude evaluation of the flow of future taxes, it would total up to nearly $1m per inhabitant. Offered the area’s riches and value, America might make every Greenlander a multimillionaire and still immensely benefit from the purchase.”

The British publication likewise emphasized the offer’s significance from a strategic perspective.

“The island sits between America and Russia in a part of the world that is ending up being more accessible as Arctic ice melts,” the Economist noted.

America’s Pituffik Space Base in Greenland’s north-western area currently provides missile-warning sensors for the armed forces. However, an American existence in Greenland might boost surveillance of the GIUK gap, a crucial path in the Atlantic Ocean used by Russian submarines to access America’s east coast and the North Atlantic.

Greenland possesses vast reserves of valuable resources, including a significant amount of the critical minerals identified by the American government. It is also believed to have rare earth deposits globally, outside of China. Additionally, there is potential for substantial oil reserves from wells located off Greenland’s coast, with estimates suggesting it could account for about 3 proven oil reserves.

The logic of this proposal is so compelling that the only significant counterargument is the potential for an inflationary surge resulting $1 million per person on a relatively small island with a population of 60,000. However, this concern can be mitigated by implementing a more gradual distribution plan, which would still yield positive results.

This is an almost guaranteed success. Anyone who doubts it is misinformed. Furthermore, the island holds significant strategic value to the United States, and its leader is essentially seeking from their current predicament. It’s a rare opportunity that presents itself with such clarity and advantage.

Well, Senate passage, for one. It’s worth noting that the Democrats were willing to run over the filibuster to add Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. when they controlled all the levers of government, and those two were both far less self-sustaining states than Greenland would be. Perhaps it’s enough to have it as a territory, as well. One way or another, Trump wins, and our enemies lose. That’s making America– and Nuuk– great again.