Looming Military Disaster

By John Livingston
August 26, 2024

Ukraine is sounding alarm bells for the United States, and with good reason. Our nation’s military preparedness is a cause for concern, as it appears ill-equipped to deal with a standard, high-intensity dispute. The ongoing situation in Ukraine is redefining the rules of modern-day warfare, and the United States is falling behind the present administration, seemingly disconnected from the reality on the ground; the country is failing to resolve its vulnerabilities, leaving it vulnerable to potential defeat in a future conflict. Our adversaries can see this clearly and are preparing a blow from which the USA will likely not recover.

Our enemies, and especially the Chinese Communist party (CCP) have every incentive to see our nation weakened and they are doing a great job at achieving their objective.As we speak, obscene amounts of dark money are flooding into the Harris-Walz campaign from sources connected to the Chinese Communist Party and their many allies throughout the world and inside the USA. At Omega4America, they can see, identify, and track this mountain of money. It’s all connected to the CCP or another source controlled by our enemies. The Harris-Walz Campaign has received over $600 million in the last several days. Many billions are flowing into front organizations that run the Massive Democrat Vote Manufacturing Machine. Harris and Walz will continue to destroy the US military and economy. They are apparent agents of the CCP and all of our enemies, including Iran and North Korea. Neither of them could pass a standard review for security clearance.

During the eight years of the Obama Administration and four years of the Biden Administration, the armed force adopted progressive ideologies and their results on problems like diversity, equality, and environmental issues. Our best military officers were forced into retirement or denied promotions or both. They are demoralized. Nevertheless, this trend is connected to the troubles exposed during the Ukraine War. When military leaders prioritize fixing perceived social problems, such as opposed racial identity and LGBTQ+ inclusivity, they divert attention far from the vital job of upgrading their methods to compete successfully in modern warfare.

And we do require massive modifications. The old knowledge is that the military constantly fights the last war. Now, we’re trying to fight the previous two battles. We are trying to refight the basic Cold War design that won the Gulf War while likewise combating the counterinsurgencies of the Global War on Terror. What we are not preparing to fight is the type of war we are seeing in Ukraine.

The dispute between Russia and Ukraine is in a traditional warfare setting, reminiscent of the trench warfare seen in World War I. Electronic warfare this dispute, with Russia using methods to counter the sophisticated precision-guided munitions provided to Ukraine by the United States. This has exposed vulnerabilities. ese munitions, which have been used successfully in Iraq and Afghanistan, can reduce the effects of Russian electronic warfare methods that have frequency systems consisting of GPS. This raises concerns about the potential repercussions for the US if it were to participate in a conflict with its precision strike abilities impaired or deteriorated.

We might not have sufficient precise ammunition readily available because a substantial amount is being dispersed to Ukraine and Israel, along with being utilized in conflicts with the Houthis. This ammunition supply is restricted and takes time and cash to replenish. With a concentration on inviting Third World immigrants, the Democrats might face challenges in focusing on military resources. In a war, our ammunition, bombs, and shells could be rapidly diminished, specifically the highly in-demand 155mm shells. The rate at which we could exhaust our ammunition stocks in an actual conflict is typically underestimated, recommending that it happen within days rather than weeks or months.
Looming Military Disaster
Nobody speaks about this because it’s not exciting or cool– America fights with logistics. We overwhelm the opponent with things that go “Boom!” In the Gulf War, we moved a city to the middle of the desert, then moved it forward in an attack. But we can’t do that today. Our military-industrial base has withered. The toolbox of democracy has become the gun-safe of democracy. We can not simply spin as much as rearm when the next war– which is coming– begins. That chooses weapons tubes, tanks, aircraft, and ships– the Chinese Navy is now larger than ours and growing greatly quicker. Perhaps their things are not as good as ours ship-to-ship– though with the Chinese spies here in America running widespread taking our secrets since the FBI is hectic collaring grannies for hoping at abortion mills, their ships probably are our ships– but the opponent has something we do not have. It’s “amount.”

The conflict in Ukraine is a plain departure from traditional military methods. A notable example is the widespread use of drones as precision-guided munitions. Video video footage of drones effectively targeting tanks enhanced positions; private troops abound online. It’s reported that of the 31 Abrams tanks sent out to Ukraine, 22 have been dispatched by Russia’s 13 million dollar Abrams tanks with $1000 drones. The battleground is cluttered with United States– British, and French military devices. Our foes are aware of this pattern, as evidenced by Hamas’s use of drones to breach Israeli defenses on October 7th. Moreover, our military bases in the Middle East have been assaulted by low-priced drones, resulting in casualties. In contrast, our drone abilities are not being made use of to the very same degree, and we are not adequately prepared to counter the massive drone attacks that end up being considerably standard.

Ukrainians and Russians show creativity, flexibility, and resourcefulness as they take on unique challenges. In contrast, our stiff-armed force, which formerly depended on American resourcefulness for success, cannot do so. Our procurement practices often result in getting the wrong weapons at high expenses and delayed timelines. Furthermore, a risk-averse officer corps prioritizing other aspects over innovation can suppress imagination among soldiers. It may be impractical to anticipate US soldiers to easily and swiftly turn low-cost drones into reliable tank destroyers without facing complex obstacles. On the other hand, the Ukrainian forces have demonstrated innovative methods. Our possible adversaries will likely be agile, advanced, and outmaneuver our leadership.
Looming Military Disaster

The present scenario in Ukraine has likewise highlighted a growing problem in the US armed forces: recruitment. The military is currently struggling due to its perceived connection with ideologies that do not align with the worth of ordinary American citizens. The message is clear: Christians feel undesirable, and individuals with particular natural characteristics are being required to make a decision. Consequently, potential recruits are being dissuaded from signing up with the military by veterans. Why would they wish to get it when it could imply combating to support authoritarian programs in Europe or serving under a leadership that has not achieved a clear victory in decades and appears to loathe them?

No thanks. It’s a tough pass. That happens when you have a military with less General George Patton than Command Sergeant Major (sic) Tim Walz.

The present administration’s disregard for traditional military recruits is disconcerting, but the worrying diversity of casualties is a harsh reality. If the US were to participate in a massive conflict, the repercussions would likely be devastating. One US Carrier destroyed could lead to 5000 or more casualties. Who would volunteer for a war driven by ideology instead of an authentic sense of purpose, especially when it’s clear that those in power do not value the lives of service members? The after-effects of the Kabul disaster, which saw no one held accountable, have likely reinforced the perception that the lives of military personnel are disposable to the ruling elite.

We have not taken any lessons from the Ukrainian-Russian War or other international disputes and tensions. If we do not modify our path, we will be overwhelmed. Do you believe Kamala Harris will think about the duties of being commander-in-chief? Did her acceptance speech last Friday telling the world that half of Americans are racist and anti-democratic provide you with assurance? It appears she is more concentrated on communism and conceit.

If our challengers were to use the weak points in our armed forces, it would most likely result in a crushing loss. You must take this caution seriously, but you may need to learn the magnitude of our threat.